Research Trends and Impact Factor on PubMed Among General Medicine Physicians in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis
Takashi Watari,Yasuhisa Nakano,Ashwin Gupta,Minami Kakehi,Ayuko Tokonami,Yasuharu Tokuda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S378662
IF: 2.145
2022-09-14
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Takashi Watari, 1– 3 Yasuhisa Nakano, 4 Ashwin Gupta, 2, 3 Minami Kakehi, 4 Ayuko Tokonami, 4 Yasuharu Tokuda 5 1 General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan; 2 Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3 Medicine Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 4 Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan; 5 Muribushi Okinawa Clinical Training Center, Urasoe, Okinawa, Japan Correspondence: Takashi Watari, Shimane University Hospital, General Medicine Center, 89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan, Tel +81-853-20-2005, Fax +81-853-20-2375, Email Background: Japan created a specialty system for general medicine in 2018. However, Japanese academic generalists' contribution to research remains unclear. This study examines the popularity of Japanese general medicine research, the characteristics of journal publications, annual trends, and the characteristics/differences among publications in journals with an impact factor (IF). Methods: This bibliometric analysis extracted international, English-language, journal articles published on PubMed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Analysis included articles with either the first, second, or last author in general medicine. We classified articles according to publication or article type and field of research. We obtained standard descriptive statistics for each publication type. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare nominal variables. For continuous variables, t -tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used, as appropriate. Results: Of the 2372 articles analyzed, original articles were most common (56.3%), followed by case reports (30.1%), reviews (7.63%), and letters/others (5.9%). Publication volume increased 2.64-fold annually over 5 years. Clinical research (60.5%) was most common among original articles, followed by basic experimental research (17.5%) and public health/epidemiology (12.7%). Medical quality and safety (4.1%), medical and clinical education (3.1%), and health services (1.42%) received comparatively little attention. Eighty percent of articles were published in journals with IF; however, these journals rarely published case reports. Among original articles, the likelihood of publishing in journals with IF was high for basic laboratory medicine articles with higher IF (median IF 3.83, OR 1.71, 95% CI 2.20– 5.95, p=0.044) and lower for clinical education research with the lowest IF (median IF 1.83, OR 0.56, 95% CI 01.8– 0.75, p< 0.001). Discussion: General medicine physicians' international research output is increasing in Japan; however, research achievements have not been generalized, but rather much influenced by clinical subspecialty backgrounds. This will likely continue unless an academic generalist discipline is established. Keywords: general medicine, academic generalist, research productivity, research trend, impact factor Research forms the heart of medical contributions that advance the practice of general medicine. 1–5 In the US, where general medicine research is well-established and vibrant, scholarship in family and hospital medicine has led to scientific validation and advancement in fields such as patient safety, 6,7 healthcare economics and cost-effectiveness, 8,9 medical education, 10,11 patient satisfaction and patient-centered care, 12 and high-quality medical services. 7,12–14 The publication of such literature has led to the recognition of generalists by their peers as clinicians and scientists. 4,15–18 In Japan, however, it was not until 2018 that general medicine was established as an official program—its 19th specialty accreditation. 17,19 Thus, Japanese general medicine is in its formative years, and there is no precise segregation of this discipline thus far. At this stage, there are several types of general medicine physicians: those that do not have a hospital role, but rather have a role equivalent to a family medicine physician or primary care physician versus those that care for patients with acute diseases in hospitals, such as hospital medicine and general internal medicine. Many general medicine physicians can choose their own clinical style depending on the clinical setting, which is a unique system in the world. Consequently, its corresponding field of research remains nascent. 19,20 With this background, Japan's international contribution to general medicine research remains unclear, and there is little knowledge of trends in Japanese research grants or funding and -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal