Abstract:Introduction: Periprosthetic humeral fractures are a rare and increasing entity due to the rising number of shoulder arthroplasties. These fractures pose a significant challenge for surgeons, with incidence rates ranging from 1.2% to 19.4%. They can occur intraoperatively or as late complications, often influenced by trauma, prosthetic wear, or loosening. Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients admitted with periprosthetic humeral fractures over a four-year period (2018-2022). Inclusion criteria were postoperative periprosthetic humeral fractures with a minimum follow-up of six months. Exclusion criteria included intraoperative fractures, fractures of the glenoid or coracoid process, and cases with follow-up of less than six months or incomplete data. Results: The study included six patients with an average age of 83.1 years, predominantly female (four females and two males). All fractures occurred postoperatively: four on reverse shoulder prostheses, one on an anatomical prosthesis, and one on a hemiarthroplasty. The mechanism was low-energy trauma, with fractures occurring an average of 96 months post-initial surgery. Fractures were classified using the Campbell system: three in region 4, two in region 3, and one in region 2. Radiographs showed four cemented and two uncemented stems. Three patients underwent surgical treatment with either prosthetic replacement using a long stem and fracture cerclage or locking compression plate (LCP). The remaining three patients were treated conservatively with a Sarmiento brace due to advanced age, bone fragility, low functional demand, and comorbidities. Radial nerve palsy was a complication in two patients post-trauma, with one recovering fully and the other not recovering before death due to associated complications. All fractures consolidated within an average of seven months (range: 5-8 months). Functional recovery was satisfactory with a median Constant-Murley Shoulder Score of 69 in surgically treated patients, with range of motion between 100 and 140 degrees. Only two conservatively treated patients achieved fracture consolidation, and functional recovery was inadequate. Discussion: Managing periprosthetic humeral fractures remains challenging. Treatment goals include fracture healing, maintaining prosthetic stem stability, preserving glenohumeral motion, and restoring shoulder function. Despite various classification systems, the literature shows limited and variable data on incidence and treatment outcomes. Conservative treatment may be considered for stable implants and acceptable alignment, but surgical intervention is often necessary for displaced fractures or implant loosening. Conclusion: The management of periprosthetic humeral fractures requires a tailored, multidisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes and improve patient quality of life. With the increasing incidence of these fractures due to the growing use of shoulder arthroplasty, ongoing research and development of new techniques and therapeutic strategies are essential to address this clinical challenge effectively.

Surgical management of complex proximal humeral fractures: pinning, locked plate and arthroplasty

Fixation of Complex Middle-Proximal Humeral Shaft Fractures Using the PHILOS Plate: Early Experience

Surgical Treatment for Complicated Proximal Humeral Fractures and Analysis of Efficacy

Study of Functional Outcome and Postoperative Complications Among Proximal Humerus Fracture Patients Treated With Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Plating

Position statement: management of proximal humerus fractures

Postoperative complications of complex proximal humeral fractures after treated with proximal humeral internal locking system plate fixation

Surgical treatment ofproximal humeral fractures

Clinico-radiological and functional outcome of surgical management of displaced two part, three part and four part proximal humeral fractures in adults treated by PHILOS plate in a tertiary care hospital in North India: a prospective study of 30 patients

Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Assessment of Functional Outcome and Postoperative Complications in Proximal Humerus Fracture Patients Managed With Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Plating

Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Comparison between arthroplasty and non-operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term outcomes of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures

[Treatment Progress on Proximal Humerus Fracture with Proximal Humerus Cage].

Locking plate fixation versus primary shoulder hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

[Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracture Involving Metaphysis and Humeral Shaft].

Humeral shaft fracture: systematic review of non-operative and operative treatment

Locking plates and semi-shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures

Challenges and Outcomes in the Management of Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Study and Review of Current Approaches

Surgical treatments of patients with periprosthetic humeral fracture and comorbidities

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment in Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures