Clinical validity of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diana E Yung,Pedro Boal Carvalho,Andry Giannakou,Uri Kopylov,Bruno Rosa,Emanuele Rondonotti,Ervin Toth,John N Plevris,Anastasios Koulaouzidis,Diana Yung,John Plevris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-122015
2017-01-25
Endoscopy
Abstract:<b>Patients and methods</b> A comprehensive literature search was conducted. We measured pooled rate of lesion visualization improvement and improvement in lesion detection comparing FICE settings 1 - 3 and WLE, for angioectasias and ulcers/erosions. Pooled results were derived using the random-effects model because of high heterogeneity as measured by <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to measure differences in lesion detection between WLE and the three FICE modes. <b>Results</b> 13 studies were analyzed. All studies used the PillCam SB 1 and/or SB 2 devices. Most used experienced readers. Improvement in delineation had been investigated in 4 studies; in the 3 studies entered into the meta-analysis, using FICE setting 1, 89 % of angioectasias and 45 % of ulcer/erosions were considered to show improved delineation. For FICE settings 2 and 3, small proportions of images showed improved delineation. Heterogeneity of studies was high with <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 90 % in 4/6 analyses. Lesion detection had been investigated in 10 studies; meta-analysis included 5 studies. Lesion detection did not differ significantly between any of the FICE modes and WLE. <b>Conclusions</b> Overall, the use of the three FICE modes did not significantly improve delineation or detection rate in SBCE. In pigmented lesions, FICE setting 1 performed better in lesion delineation and detection.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?