Abstract:DNA damage checkpoints are key guardians of genome integrity. Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage by triggering extensive phosphorylation of Rad53/CHK2 effector kinase, whereupon activated Rad53/CHK2 mediates further aspects of checkpoint activation, including cell cycle arrest and transcriptional changes. Budding yeast Candida glabrata , closely related to model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae , is an opportunistic pathogen characterized by high genetic diversity and rapid emergence of drug-resistant mutants. However, the mechanisms underlying this genetic variability are unclear. We used Western blotting and mass spectrometry to show that, unlike S. cerevisiae , C. glabrata cells exposed to DNA damage did not induce C. glabrata Rad53 (CgRad53) phosphorylation. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis showed that, unlike S. cerevisiae , C. glabrata cells did not accumulate in S phase upon DNA damage. Consistent with these observations, time-lapse microscopy showed C. glabrata cells continuing to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in mitotic errors and cell death. Finally, transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) analysis revealed transcriptional rewiring of the DNA damage response in C. glabrata and identified several key protectors of genome stability upregulated by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but downregulated in C. glabrata , including proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Together, our results reveal a noncanonical fungal DNA damage response in C. glabrata , which may contribute to rapidly generating genetic change and drug resistance. IMPORTANCE In order to preserve genome integrity, all cells must mount appropriate responses to DNA damage, including slowing down or arresting the cell cycle to give the cells time to repair the damage and changing gene expression, for example to induce genes involved in DNA repair. The Rad53 protein kinase is a conserved central mediator of these responses in eukaryotic cells, and its extensive phosphorylation upon DNA damage is necessary for its activation and subsequent activity. Interestingly, here we show that in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida glabrata , Rad53 phosphorylation is not induced by DNA damage, nor do these cells arrest in S phase under these conditions, in contrast to the closely related yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Instead, C. glabrata cells continue to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in significant cell lethality. Finally, we show that a number of genes involved in DNA repair are strongly induced by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but repressed in C. glabrata . Together, these findings shed new light on mechanisms regulating genome stability in fungal pathogens.

A pathway of targeted autophagy is induced by DNA damage in budding yeast

DNA damage signaling triggers the cytoplasm-to-vacuole pathway of autophagy to regulate cell cycle progression

Autophagy: A Player in response to Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage

The DNA damage response and autophagy during cancer development: an antagonistic pleiotropy entanglement

Autophagy role(s) in response to oncogenes and DNA replication stress

The Mtor–s6k Pathway Links Growth Signalling to DNA Damage Response by Targeting RNF168

Autophagy suppression in DNA damaged cells occurs through a newly identified p53-proteasome-LC3 axis

Crosstalk between the mTOR and DNA Damage Response Pathways in Fission Yeast

Endonuclease G promotes autophagy by suppressing mTOR signaling and activating the DNA damage response

ATR/Chk1 Signaling Induces Autophagy Through Sumoylated RhoB-mediated Lysosomal Translocation of TSC2 after DNA Damage

Autophagy and DNA damage repair

TOR and MAP kinase pathways synergistically regulate autophagy in response to nutrient depletion in fission yeast

FACS-based genome-wide CRISPR screens define key regulators of DNA damage signaling pathways

TOR-dependent post-transcriptional regulation of autophagy

Bacterial genotoxin triggers FEN1-dependent RhoA activation, cytoskeleton remodeling and cell survival

TEX264 drives selective autophagy of DNA lesions to promote DNA repair and cell survival

Molecular Mechanism and Regulation of Autophagy1

A Noncanonical DNA Damage Checkpoint Response in a Major Fungal Pathogen

ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage

Pre-activation of the genome integrity checkpoint increases DNA damage tolerance

Identification of stress specific autophagy regulators from tandem CRISPR screens