Abstract:Abstract This article differentiates between descriptive and explanatory factors to develop a typology and a theory of stakeholder and public engagement. The typology describes different types of public and stakeholder engagement, and the theory comprises four factors that explain much of the variation in outcomes (for the natural environment and/or for participants) between different types of engagement. First, we use a narrative literature search to develop a new typology of stakeholder and public engagement based on agency (who initiates and leads engagement) and mode of engagement (from communication to coproduction). We then propose a theory to explain the variation in outcomes from different types of engagement: (1) a number of socioeconomic, cultural, and institutional contextual factors influence the outcomes of engagement; (2) there are a number of process design factors that can increase the likelihood that engagement leads to desired outcomes, across a wide range of sociocultural, political, economic, and biophysical contexts; (3) the effectiveness of engagement is significantly influenced by power dynamics, the values of participants, and their epistemologies, that is, the way they construct knowledge and which types of knowledge they consider valid; and (4) engagement processes work differently and can lead to different outcomes when they operate over different spatial and temporal scales. We use the theoretical framework to provide practical guidance for those designing engagement processes, arguing that a theoretically informed approach to stakeholder and public engagement has the potential to markedly improve the outcomes of environmental decision‐making processes.

Conceptualising the policy engagement of interest groups: Involvement, access and prominence

Political Parties and Interest Incorporation: A New Typology of Intra-Party Groups

A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?

Engaging policy in science writing: Patterns and strategies

Recruiting for Engagement in Health Policy

Rethinking policy ‘impact’: four models of research-policy relations

'Ordinary people only': knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare

A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions

The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate?

Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world

Evaluating patient and public involvement in health research: from theoretical model to practical workshop

Shifting the paradigm of research-to-policy impact: Infrastructure for improving researcher engagement and collective action

Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’

A New Conceptual Framework and Approach to Decision Making in Public Policy

Advancing Active Allyship for Social Justice: Cross-Group Friendships, Social Empathy, and Political Engagement

Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy: What Do We Know, What Do We Need to Know, and How Will We Get There?

Online political participation: the evolution of a concept

Mechanisms of young professional engagement in health policy development: a cultural domain approach

Community Agency and Community Engagement: Re-theorising Participation in Governance

Politicising the landscape: a theoretical contribution towards the development of participation in landscape planning

Democratic Justifications for Patient Public Involvement and Engagement in Health Research: An Exploration of the Theoretical Debates and Practical Challenges