Abstract:Structural equation modeling (SEM) plays an important role in business and social science and so do composites, that is, linear combinations of variables. However, existing approaches to integrate composites into structural equation models still have limitations. A major leap forward has been the Henseler–Ogasawara (H–O) specification, which for the first time allows for seamlessly integrating composites into structural equation models. In doing so, it relies on emergent variables, that is, the composite of interest, and one or more orthogonal excrescent variables, that is, composites that have no surplus meaning but just span the remaining space of the emergent variable's components. Although the H–O specification enables researchers to flexibly model composites in SEM, it comes along with several practical problems: (i) The H–O specification is difficult to visualize graphically; (ii) its complexity could create difficulties for analysts, and (iii) at times SEM software packages seem to encounter convergence issues with it. In this paper, we present a refinement of the original H–O specification that addresses these three problems. In this new specification, only two components load on each excrescent variable, whereas the excrescent variables are allowed to covary among themselves. This results in a simpler graphical visualization. Additionally, researchers facing convergence issues of the original H–O specification are provided with an alternative specification. Finally, we illustrate the new specification's application by means of an empirical example and provide guidance on how (standardized) weights including their standard errors can be calculated in the R package lavaan. The corresponding Mplus model syntax is provided in the Supplementary Material.

Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling

Structural Equation Modeling in the Context of Clinical Research

Beyond ANOVA: An Introduction to Structural Equation Models for Experimental Designs

Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Social Sciences Research

Estimating and investigating multiple constructs multiple indicators social relations models with and without roles within the traditional structural equation modeling framework: A tutorial.

On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling

Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis

A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling

The application of structural equation model approach in epidemiological research]

Structural Equation Modeling and Its Applications in Empirical Analyses

What Kinds of Research Questions Need to Be Answered by Structural Equation Modeling

Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement

Scale-Invariance, Equivariance and Dependency of Structural Equation Models

A structural after measurement approach to structural equation modeling.

A model selection approach to structural equation modelling: A critical evaluation and a road map for ecologists

Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review

An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling

A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality

Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods

On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems

Specifying composites in structural equation modeling: A refinement of the Henseler–Ogasawara specification