Abstract:Background: Game-based learning appears to be a promising instructional method because of its engaging properties and positive effects on motivation and learning. There are numerous options to design game-based learning; however, there is little data-informed knowledge to guide the choice of the most effective game-based learning design for a given educational context. The effectiveness of game-based learning appears to be dependent on the degree to which players like the game. Hence, individual differences in game preferences should be taken into account when selecting a specific game-based learning design. Objective: We aimed to identify patterns in students' perceptions of play and games-player types and their most important characteristics. Methods: We used Q methodology to identify patterns in opinions on game preferences. We recruited undergraduate medical and dental students to participate in our study and asked participants to sort and rank 49 statements on game preferences. These statements were derived from a prior focus group study and literature on game preferences. We used by-person factor analysis and varimax rotation to identify common viewpoints. Both factors and participants' comments were used to interpret and describe patterns in game preferences. Results: From participants' (n=102) responses, we identified 5 distinct patterns in game preferences: the social achiever, the explorer, the socializer, the competitor, and the troll. These patterns revolved around 2 salient themes: sociability and achievement. The 5 patterns differed regarding cheating, playing alone, story-telling, and the complexity of winning. Conclusions: The patterns were clearly interpretable, distinct, and showed that medical and dental students ranged widely in how they perceive play. Such patterns may suggest that it is important to take students' game preferences into account when designing game-based learning and demonstrate that not every game-based learning-strategy fits all students. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use a scientifically sound approach to identify player types. This can help future researchers and educators select effective game-based learning game elements purposefully and in a student-centered way.

Digital Game Dynamics Preferences and Player Types

Identifying Player Types to Tailor Game-Based Learning Design to Learners: Cross-sectional Survey using Q Methodology

Gender and Age Differences in Preferences on Game Elements and Platforms

Emotional reactions of different interface formats: Comparing digital and traditional board games

Exploring the Reasons for Preferring Digital Games Over Physical Activity Games in Adolescents: A Qualitative Study

Game affordance, gamer orientation, and in‐game purchases: A hedonic–instrumental framework

Your Favorite Gameplay Speaks Volumes about You: Predicting User Behavior and Hexad Type

Why iPlay: The Relationships of Autistic and Schizotypal Traits With Patterns of Video Game Use

Design recommendations for active games

How Digital Strategy and Management Games Can Facilitate the Practice of Dynamic Decision-Making

The relationship between user types and gamification designs

Characteristics and Motivations of Players with Disabilities in Digital Games

Player Types in Gamified Learning: Conceptualization, Validation, and Profiling

Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Individual Motives for Playing Digital Games

The gamer psychology: a psychological perspective on game design and gamification

Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework

Do people's user types change over time? An exploratory study

New Consumers of the Digital Age: Game Players

Informal learning and wellbeing outcomes of gameplay and their associations with gameplay motivation

Dynamic difficulty adjustment approaches in video games: a systematic literature review