Easing and Rising of Tension from Presence of Others in Player-Observer Turn-Taking in a Driving Video Game: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
Tao Liu,Hirofumi Saito,Misato Oi,Matthew Pelowski
2012-01-01
Abstract:Easing and rising of tension from presence of others in player-observer turn-taking in a driving video game: A near-infrared spectroscopy study Tao Liu (liu@cog.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp) Hirofumi Saito (saito@is.nagoya-u.ac.jp) Misato Oi (oi@cog.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp) Matthew Pelowski (matthew@cog.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp) Department of Cognitive Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan Abstract Social facilitation and social support literature, diverging with regards to increasing versus decreasing of an individual’s tension, apprehend different aspects of “the presence of others.” To examine the neural correlates of social presence effects, whether “the presence of others” increases or decreases an individual’s tension, we measured prefrontal activation while participants performed a driving video game task using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Participants were divided into single and paired groups, and then sub-divided according to their game proficiency (high and low). The participant’s task was to drive from start to goal with a default route map without an observer (single group) or under observation by an acquainted partner (paired group). The paired participants alternated their player-observer roles in a turn-taking style (Driver first and Observer second: D1-O2; Observer first and Driver second: O1-D2). The behavioral data demonstrated that, regardless of game proficiency, D1 in the paired group yielded fewer errors and longer driving time than single players, while no differences were found between D1 and D2. The tension evaluation scores in single players and D2 were higher than D1. In turn, the NIRS data revealed that, in low-proficiency players, single players and D2 who first observed D1’s performance showed higher activation than D1, but neither did so in high- proficiency players. These results suggest that the presence of an acquainted partner (O1) functions positively to reduce an individual’s (D1) tension in low-proficiency players. However, prior observation of another’s performance may negate the positive social presence effect leading to an increase of tension in the subsequent task. Keywords: presence of others; social facilitation; social support; individual difference; prefrontal cortex (PFC); near- infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Introduction Social cognitive neuroscience is a burgeoning inter- disciplinary field combining the tools of cognitive neuroscience with questions and theories from various social sciences such as social psychology. Classical literature in social psychology has been primarily subsumed under two heads: direct interpersonal influence via interaction between persons and indirect interpersonal influence induced by the presence of others (Allport, 1920). The latter is a fundamental, as well as the oldest, experimental research in social psychology. As put by Gordon Allport (1954), “the first experimental problem … was formulated as follows: What change in an individual’s normal solitary performance occurs when other people are present?” (p. 46). The present study considers this type of question, and aims to examine the effects of social presence on the individual’s neural state in a player-observer dyadic situation. Two main existing areas of research deal with different aspects of the presence of others. One is social facilitation that investigates how social presence affects one’s performance in a general way. Another is social support that focuses on the issue of how other person present relaxes an individual in the stressful environments. Social facilitation literature has revealed inconsistent effects of social presence on performance; both performance improvement and impairment are possible. For instance, Floyd Allport (1924) demonstrated positive influence from social presence, coining the term social facilitation to describe the increase of response merely from the presence of others. However, not all research shows positive effects. Sometimes the presence of others impairs an individual’s performance (e.g., Pessin, 1933). To explain the seemingly conflicting results, Zajonc (1965) offered a predominant interpretation based on the Hull-Spence drive theory. According to Zajonc’s arousal theory, the presence of others increases an individual’s general arousal level, which in turn enhances the emission of dominant responses. In a simple task, appropriate responses are typically dominant, and accordingly the presence of others will improve performance; whereas in a complex task, appropriate responses are more typically not dominant, thus performance will be impaired. There has been general agreement with this arousal-based explanation in the following social facilitation literature, with considerable debate mostly centered on the source of arousal itself—evolving several conceptualizations such as evaluation-apprehension theory (Cottrell, 1972), monitoring theory (Guerin & Innes, 1982), and distraction-conflict theory (Baron, 1986; for review see Aiello & Douthitt, 2001; Guerin, 1993; Uziel, 2007). These theories clearly differ in their explanations for performance effects of social presence. However, attempts to pinpoint a single exclusively accurate theory have been proven unsuccessful (Guerin, 1993), due