Abstract:Background Audience segmentation is an analysis technique that can identify meaningful subgroups within a population to inform the tailoring of dissemination strategies. We have conducted an empirical clustering audience segmentation study of licensed psychologists using survey data about the sources of knowledge they report most often consulting to guide their clinical decision-making. We identify meaningful subgroups within the population and inform the tailoring of dissemination strategies for evidence-based practice (EBP) materials. Method Data come from a 2018–2019 web-based survey of licensed psychologists who were members of the American Psychological Association (APA; N = 518, response rate = 29.8%). Ten dichotomous variables assessed sources that psychologists regularly consult to inform clinical decision-making (e.g., colleagues, academic literature, and practice guidelines). We used latent class analysis to identify segments of psychologists who turn to similar sources and named each segment based on the segment's most salient characteristics. Results Four audience segments were identified: the No-guidelines (45% of psychologists), Research-driven (16%), Thirsty-for-knowledge (9%), and No-reviews (30%). The four segments differed not only in their preferred sources of knowledge, but also in the types of evidence-based posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments they provide, their awareness and usage intention of the APA PTSD clinical practice guideline, and attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines. Conclusion The results demonstrate that licensed psychologists are heterogeneous in terms of their knowledge-seeking behaviors and preferences for knowledge sources. The distinctive characteristics of these segments could guide the tailoring of dissemination materials and strategies to subsequently enhance the implementation of EBP among psychologists. Plain Language Summary Audience segmentation is a dissemination strategy that categorizes a group of intended users or audience into meaningful subgroups based on their beliefs, behaviors, and/or other characteristics. Like many other scientific or medical fields, clinical psychology also struggles to use clinically tested psychological treatments (or EBPs) in everyday practice due to practical challenges. To help address such barriers, professional organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA) publish clinical practice guidelines that practitioners can use to learn more about EBPs. However, even these clinical practice guidelines are not often used, so this study employed the audience segmentation analysis to better understand psychologists’ diverse attitudes, behaviors, and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines and other clinical information sources. Our study found four distinct subgroups within approximately 600 APA-registered psychologists based on their preferred source of knowledge: the no-guidelines (45% of psychologists), research-driven (16%), thirsty-for-knowledge (9%), and no-reviews (30%). Each subgroup also varied in the types of evidence-based treatments they provide, as well as their awareness, willingness to use, and attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines. This result shows that licensed psychologists are not a uniform group and that dissemination strategies should be adjusted to each subgroup's characteristics to maximize the effort to increase the use of EBPs among psychologists.

Psychological Literacy in Applied Psychology Disciplines

Psychologically Literate by Design: Four Case Study Undergraduate Modules that Centre Psychological Literacy

Making Psychological Literacy an Integral Part of the Psychology Bachelor Curriculum: Exploring Teacher Experiences and Student Views

Psychological Literacy and Undergraduate Psychology Education: An International Provocation

The measurement of psychological literacy: a first approximation

Psychology Students’ Understanding of Ethics and Application of Ethical Principles

Psychology is a Science: At Least Some Students Think So

Innovative Approaches to Undergraduate Psychology Education Within the New Liberal Arts Framework

Back to Basics: The Importance of Conceptual Clarification in Psychological Science

Reflective practice in clinical psychology: Reflections from basic psychological science.

Psychological Misconceptions: Recent Scientific Advances and Unresolved Issues

Ethical issues in education and training.

A comprehensive scan of psychological disciplines through self-identification on Google Scholar: Relative endorsement, topical coverage, and publication patterns

Assessment of Scientific Inquiry and Critical Thinking: Measuring APA Goal 2 Student Learning Outcomes

The competency movement within psychology: An historical perspective.

Where do psychologists turn to inform clinical decisions? Audience segmentation to guide dissemination strategies

Psychology’s Status as a Science: Peculiarities and Intrinsic Challenges. Moving Beyond its Current Deadlock Towards Conceptual Integration

PROVIDING NECESSARY RESOURCES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ACQUISITIONS WHEN STUDYING PSYCHOLOGY IN THE CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL STATE

PSYCHOLOGY IN LEGAL EDUCATION: MODERN CHALLENGES AND THE STATE OF PRACTICE

Assessing the need for pre-mental health competencies in undergraduate education: insights from graduate faculty surveys

The importance of teaching climate-health literacy in psychotherapeutic training and continuing education