Abstract:The success of Open Science in addressing the replication crisis and restoring credibility in psychology can be understood more completely by examining the successes and challenges of adapting the recommended best practices by researchers at different types of institutions, different career stages, and from different subfields within social and personality psychology. In this article, we offer personal reflections about the impact and future of the Open Science movement in a conversational form between three researchers at varying career stages who focus on different subdisciplines (relationship science, diversity science, and social neuroscience and social cognition) and work at universities that place a different emphasis on research (relative to teaching and service). We see many successes of the open science movement, but we also note that implementation has trailed behind its full potential because (a) the incentive structures of our existing rigid system remain misaligned with some open-science goals, and (b) some open science solutions were designed by researchers with certain types of scientific practices in mind. We all feel encouraged by the focus on larger samples, greater data sharing, and pre-registration both for experimental design and analytical decisions. However, there are areas that need attention. Our perspective is that the open science movement has not been as strong of an ally as it could be to another goal of psychological science: increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion. Additionally, more careful consideration of how to facilitate data sharing and pre-registration is needed and may necessitate a shift in the incentive structure of our field.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and social cognition.

Inaugural editorial.

Inaugural editorial for Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance .

New directions for the Journal of Health Psychology

Editorial: Social Determinants of Psychological Illness and Well-Being Across the Life Course

Inaugural editorial for Journal of Counseling Psychology .

Special Editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry - next steps?

Inaugural editorial for Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition.

Reflections on the Journal of Applied Psychology in times of change.

Moving forward while looking back: Reflections on the history and future of the journal Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology .

Editor bias and transparency in psychology's open science era.

In This Issue, Psychoanalytic Dialogues 34-2

Psychology needs more diversity at the level of Editor-in-Chief

Social psychological research on gender, sexuality, and relationships: reflections on contemporary scientific and cultural challenges

Exploring the Black Box of Journal Manuscript Review: A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Evolving Perspectives and Methodologies in Developmental Psychology

Journal of Public Policy & Marketing in Our Turbulent Times: Foundations Laid and Challenges Ahead

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

Editor bias and diversifying psychology: Commentary on Sharpe (2024).

Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial Practices