Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the accuracy of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (Pcv-aCO2) before and after rapid rehydration test (fluid challenge) in predicting the fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. METHODS:A prospective observation was conducted. Forty septic shock patients admitted to medical intensive care unit (ICU) of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2015 to June 2017 were enrolled. All of the patients received fluid challenge in the presence of invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, cardiac index (CI), Pcv-aCO2 and other physiological variables were recorded at 10 minutes before and immediately after fluid challenge. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI greater than 10% after fluid challenge, whereas fluid non-responsiveness was defined as no increase or increase in CI less than 10%. The correlation between Pcv-aCO2 and CI was explored by Pearson correlation analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to evaluate the discriminatory abilities of baseline and the changes after fluid challenge in Pcv-aCO2 and other physiological variables to define the fluid responsiveness. The patients were separated into two groups according to the initial value of Pcv-aCO2. The cut-off value of 6 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) was chosen according to previous studies. The discriminatory abilities of baseline and the change in Pcv-aCO2 (ΔPcv-aCO2) were assessed in each group. RESULTS:A total of 40 patients were finally included in this study. Twenty-two patients responded to the fluid challenge (responders). Eighteen patients were fluid non-responders. There was no significant difference in baseline physiological variable between the two groups. Fluid challenge could increase CI and blood pressure significantly, decrease HR notably and had no effect on Pcv-aCO2 in fluid responders. In non-responders, blood pressure was increased significantly and CI, HR, Pcv-aCO2 showed no change after fluid challenge. Pcv-aCO2 was comparable in responders and non-responders. In 40 patients, CI and Pcv-aCO2 was inversely correlated before fluid challenge (r = -0.391, P = 0.012) and the correlation between them weakened after fluid challenge (r = -0.301, P = 0.059). There was no significant correlation between the changes in CI and Pcv-aCO2 after fluid challenge (r = -0.164, P = 0.312). The baseline Pcv-aCO2 and ΔPcv-aCO2 could not discriminate between responders and non-responders, with the area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.50 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.32-0.69] and 0.51 (95%CI = 0.33-0.70), respectively. HR and blood pressure before fluid challenge and their changes after fluid challenge showed very poor discriminative performances. Before fluid challenge, 16 patients had a Pcv-aCO2 > 6 mmHg. Their mean CI was significantly lower and Pcv-aCO2 was significantly higher than that in 24 patients whose Pcv-aCO2 ≤ 6 mmHg [n = 24; CI (mL×s-1×m-2): 48.3±11.7 vs. 65.0±18.3, P < 0.01; Pcv-aCO2 (mmHg): 8.4±1.9 vs. 2.9±2.8, P < 0.01]. Pcv-aCO2 was decreased significantly after fluid challenge in patients with an initial Pcv-aCO2 > 6 mmHg and their ΔPcv-aCO2 was notably different as compared with the patients whose baseline Pcv-aCO2 ≤ 6 mmHg (mmHg: -3.8±3.4 vs. 0.9±2.9, P < 0.01). 68.8% (11/16) patients responded to the fluid challenge in patients with an initial Pcv-aCO2 > 6 mmHg. The AUC of the baseline Pcv-aCO2 and ΔPcv-aCO2 to define fluid responsiveness was 0.85 (95%CI = 0.66-1.00) and 0.84 (95%CI = 0.63-1.00), respectively, and the positive predictive value was 1 when the cut-off value was 8.0 mmHg and -4.2 mmHg, respectively. 45.8% (11/24) patients responded to the fluid challenge in patients whose baseline Pcv-aCO2 ≤ 6 mmHg. There was no predictive value of baseline Pcv-aCO2 and ΔPcv-aCO2 on fluid responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS:Pcv-aCO2 and its change cannot serve as a surrogate of the change in cardiac output to define the response to fluid challenge in septic shock patients whose baseline Pcv-aCO2 ≤ 6 mmHg, while the predictive values of baseline Pcv-aCO2 and the change in Pcv-aCO2 are presented in patients with the initial value of Pcv-aCO2 > 6 mmHg. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinical Trials, NCT01941472.

Acute hyperventilation increases the central venous-to-arterial PCO2 difference in stable septic shock patients

The Evaluation Value of Severity and Prognosis of Septic Shock Patients Based on the Arterial-to-venous Carbon Dioxide Difference

Significance of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference for Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Septic Patients

Central Venous-To-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference As A Guiding Parameter For Cardiotonic Drug Administration In Patients With Early-Stage Septic Shock

Assessment of Central Venous-to-arterial CO2 Difference During Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock

Prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study

Effect of central venous-to-arterial blood carbon dioxide partial pressure difference in guiding fluid resuscitation of septic shock

Effect of the Application of Continuous Cenous Venous Hemofiltration on Pulmonary Vascular Permeability in the Early Stage of Septic Shock

A High Mean Arterial Pressure Target is Associated with Improved Microcirculation in Septic Shock Patients with Previous Hypertension: A Prospective Open-Label Study

A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study Using ΔPCO2/Ca-vO2 as the Target to Guide Early Tissue Hypoperfusion in Sepsis in Plateau Areas

Changes in central venous-to-arterial PCO2 difference and central venous oxygen saturation as markers to define fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: a pot-hoc analysis of a multi-center prospective study

Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in critically ill pediatric patients with septic shock

[Predictive Value of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference for Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Patients: a Prospective Clinical Study].

Central venous oxygen saturation changes as a reliable predictor of the change of CI in septic shock: To explore potential influencing factors

Effects of Permissive Hypercapnia on Pulmonary Mechanics and Hemodynamics During Mechanical Ventilation in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Effect of Hyperventilation on Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation During Total Intravenous Anesthesia

Assessing acid-base status in circulatory failure. Differences between arterial and central venous blood.

Prognostic value of differences between peripheral arterial and venous blood gas analysis in patients with septic shock

[Efficacy analysis of inferior vena cava variability combined with difference of central venous-to-arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide on guiding fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock]

P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2-directed Resuscitation Does Not Improve Prognosis Compared with SvO2 in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Short-term mild hyperventilation on intracranial pressure, cerebral autoregulation, and oxygenation in acute brain injury patients: a prospective observational study