Abstract:The emergence of politically driven divisions in online discussion networks has attracted a wealth of literature, but also one which has thus far been largely limited to single country studies. Hence whilst there is good evidence that these networks do divide and fragment into what are often described as "echo chambers", we know little about the factors which might explain this division or make networks more or less fragmented, as studies have been limited to a small number of political groupings with limited possibilities for systematic comparison. This paper seeks to remedy this deficit, by providing a systematic large scale study of fragmentation on Twitter which considers discussion networks surrounding 90 different political parties in 23 different countries. It shows that political party groupings which are further apart in ideological terms interact less, and that individuals and parties which sit at the extreme ends of the ideological scale are particularly likely to form echo chambers. Indeed, exchanges between centrist parties who sit on different sides of the left-right divide are more likely than communication between centrist and extremist parties who are, notionally, from the same ideological wing. In light of the results, theory about exposure to different ideological viewpoints online is discussed and enhanced.

Interest aggregators, not office chasers: evidence for party convergence and divergence in Australia

Competition, scandal, or ideology? A congruence analysis of Australian political finance reforms (1980–2020)

Political Parties and Interest Incorporation: A New Typology of Intra-Party Groups

Divergent views of party positions: How ideology and own issue position shape party perception through convergence and divergence processes

The consequences of membership incentives: Do greater political benefits attract different kinds of members?

Complex hypergraph analysis of Australian MPs' professional connections, 1947-2019

The construction of party membership

Why are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A "Satisficing" Dynamical Model

Ambiguity and vagueness in party competition

Social Cohesion in Australia: Comparing Church and Community

Party membership, pre-parliamentary socialization and party cohesion

Do Parties Matter for Environmental Policy Stringency? Exploring the Program-to-Policy Link for Environmental Issues in 28 Countries 1990–2015

Explaining the patterns of contacts between interest groups and political parties: Revising the standard model for populist times

Activist model of political party growth

Social Structure, Value‐Orientations, and the Party System: The Problem of Interest Accommodation in Western Democracies

Social structure and voting in the Austrian party system

Partisanship, expertise, or connections? A conjoint survey experiment on lobbyist hiring decisions

Party membership and closeness and the development of trust in political institutions

Why do party elites incentivise activism? The case of the populist radical right

Leadership and the Australian Greens

Explaining the emergence of echo chambers on social media: the role of ideology and extremism