Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis

Shilpa Krishnan,Monique R. Pappadis,Susan C. Weller,Steve R. Fisher,Catherine C. Hay,Timothy A. Reistetter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1297855
2017-03-21
Disability and Rehabilitation
Abstract:<p xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table"><b>Purpose:</b> To explore the mobility-related preferences among stroke survivors and caregivers following post-acute rehabilitation at inpatient or skilled nursing facilities.</p><p xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table"><b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study; semi-structured, qualitative interviews of stroke survivors (<i>n</i> = 24) and informal caregivers (<i>n</i> = 15) were conducted. The participants were recruited from the community.</p><p xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table"><b>Results:</b> Comparative content analysis was used to identify themes by two independent coders. The survivors (68 years) and caregivers (58 years) mentioned mobility-related consequences including inability to walk, balance, drive, and transfer; and increased falls. The survivors (63%) and caregivers (73%) also mentioned the use of assistive devices. The common rehabilitation activities included: walking (62%); followed by standing and mobility; strength and balance; and wheelchair skills. Some stroke survivors were dissatisfied as their rehabilitation was not patient-centered. Frequently mentioned outcome preferences by survivors were ability to walk (88%), move, and balance. They also wanted to acquire assistive devices to move independently. Caregivers were concerned with the survivor’s safety and wanted them to drive (53%), prevent falls, have home accommodations, and transfer independently. Caregivers (40%) also expressed the importance of receiving realistic information.</p><p xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table"><b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests a need to consider the stroke survivors’ and caregivers’ mobility outcome preferences to improve the patient-centered rehabilitation care.<ul class="NLM_list NLM_list-list_type-bullet"><li class="IN_LIST-title"><span class="title" id="d87359e349">Implications for Rehabilitation</span></li><li><p class="inline">Stroke survivors and caregivers tend to differ in their outcome preferences.</p></li><li><p class="inline">Caregivers expressed concern for transfers, driving, fall prevention, home modifications, and wished for realistic information.</p></li><li><p class="inline">Incorporating stroke survivors and their families’ perspectives during rehabilitation may enhance patient-centered outcomes.</p></li></ul></p>
rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?