Abstract:Robert Nozick initiated one of the most inspired and inspiring discussions in political philosophy with his 1974 response in Anarchy, State, and Utopia to John Rawls’s 1971 account of distributive justice in A Theory of Justice. These two works have informed an enormous amount of subsequent, especially liberal, discussions of economic justice, where Nozick’s work typically functions as a resource for those defending more rightwing (libertarian) positions, whereas Rawls’s has been used to defend leftwing stances. Common to these discussions, as found in politics generally (where similar kinds of arguments frequently are used to defend right and the leftwing policies and conclusions) is that they end in rather stubborn stalemates: the right defends minimal states while the left defends more extensive states. Interesting, too, is that both Nozick and Rawls take themselves to be consistent with, inspired by, and furthering Kant’s freedom project in the development of their own Kantian theories of justice. In this chapter, I start by outlining the structures of these debates with an emphasis on the original disagreements between Nozick and Rawls. I then show how neither theory actually employed Kant’s own theory of justice, but rather drew on or out (presumed) implications of his ethical theory. In the final sections, I argue that if Nozick and Rawls had instead used Kant’s theory of justice and not his ethics, not only would their individual theories have been stronger, but also they could have found ways of overcoming the unproductive stalemates that characterize their own as well as subsequent related discussions of economic justice as we currently find them in scholarly and contemporary political debates.

Marx’s concept of distributive justice: an exercise in the formal modeling of political principles

The Ideality and Reality of Marx's Theory of Human Liberalization

Understanding Marx's Concept of Justice

The Complex of Theory of Rawls' Education Equity and the Criticism of Its Principle of Methodology

From Principle to Context: Marx versus Nozick and Rawls on Distributive Justice

Marx’s Concept of Fairness and the Socialist Market Economy

Justice beyond Justice——Reflection on Debate of "Marx and Justice"

Revisiting Marx’s Critique of Liberalism

Marx, exploitation, and socioeconomic justice: Analytical and strategic possibilities

From Theory of Justice to Theory of Morals——An Analysis based on Marxism and the Moral Point of View

Analysis of a Conception in Critique on Guiding Principle of Gotha

Justice as a Social Bargain and Optimization Problem

Marx’s Civil Society Theory

Efficiency, entitlements and deservingness: Perspectives on international distributive justice

Rawls Vs. Nozick Vs. Kant on Domestic Economic Justice

Marxist State Theory in a Globalized Age

Constructing the Normative Basis of Immorality of Exploitation and Criticizing the Contemporary Liberal Theory of Justice——Two Basic Paths for Marxists to Turn to Political Philosophy

Working Out Marx: Marxism and the End of the Work Society

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

On the Intermediate Principle of Marx's Philosophy:His Critical Theory of Freedom