Abstract:IMPORTANCE: Studies comparing surgical results of rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage (ACC) and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are rare.OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical results of major augmentation rhinoplasty using ACC vs IHCC and analyze the histologic properties of both types of cartilage.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted among patients who had undergone rhinoseptoplasty using ACC or IHCC from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014. Patients were followed up for more than 1 year after surgery and the histologic characteristics of ACC and IHCC were compared. The details of the surgical procedures and complications, including warping, infection, resorption, and/or donor-site morbidity, were evaluated by reviewing medical records and facial photographs. Patients' subjective satisfaction with aesthetic and functional results was evaluated using a questionnaire.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The details of the surgical procedures and complications, including warping, infection, resorption, and/or donor-site morbidity; patients' subjective satisfaction with aesthetic and functional results' objective evaluation of surgical outcomes, including symmetry, dorsal height, dorsal length, dorsal width, tip projection, tip rotation, tip width, and overall result; and histologic structures. Objective evaluation of surgical outcomes was graded using the Objective Rhinoplasty Outcome Score, which assessed symmetry, dorsal height, dorsal length, dorsal width, tip projection, tip rotation, tip width, and overall result. Histologic structures were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin, Masson trichrome, Alcian blue, and Verhoeff elastic stains.RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (27 males and 36 females; mean [SD] age, 30.6 [9.5] years) had rhinoseptoplasty using ACC and 20 (9 males and 11 females; mean [SD] age, 35.4 [15.4] years) had rhinoseptoplasty using IHCC. Among observed complications, only notable resorption occurred more frequently in patients using IHCC (6 [30%]) than with ACC (2 [3%]) (P = .002). In subjective evaluations of aesthetic satisfaction, patients who received ACC showed significantly greater satisfaction (37 of 51 patients [73%] were very satisfied) than did those who received IHCC (6 of 20 [30%]) (P = .001). However, there was no between-group difference in subjective functional outcomes: 4 of 51 patients receiving ACC (8%) and 5 of 20 receiving IHCC (25%) were satisfied (P = .50) and 45 of 51 receiving ACC (88%) and 15 of 20 receiving IHCC (75%) were very satisfied (P = .15). Regarding objective aesthetic outcomes, all scores for both ACC and IHCC were more than 3.1 (between good and excellent). Histologic analyses showed larger, more evenly distributed, uniform chondrocytes and more collagens and proteoglycan contents in ACC than in IHCC.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with patients receiving IHCC, those receiving ACC for rhinoseptoplasty showed superior aesthetic satisfaction; ACC also had less frequent notable resorption. Autologous costal cartilage also had better histologic properties than IHCC did, suggesting it as an ideal graft material with less chance of long-term resorption.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage as Graft Material in Rhinoplasty

Outcomes of Autologous Versus Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Graft in Rhinoplasty

Cadaveric Costal Cartilage Grafts in Rhinoplasty and Septorhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes and Complications

Use of Autologous Costal Cartilage Combined with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene in Asian Rhinoplasty

Complications associated with irradiated homologous costal cartilage use in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Complications associated with autologous rib cartilage use in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis.

Hybrid Autologous Costal Cartilage Grafting for Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Asian Patients

Implanted cartilaginous grafts following rhinoplasty: A retrospective histopathological study

Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty by Cartilage Allograft

Complications Associated with Alloplastic Materials in Rhinoplasty and Their Operative Management

Biological Changes of Autologous Auricular Cartilage in Rhinoplasty.

Mechanically fragmented cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: An up-to-date systematic review

Tunneled Paranasal Augmentation Using Diced Autologous Costal Cartilage in Asian Rhinoplasty: A Comparative Study

Discussion: Injectable Cartilage Microtissue Regenerated by Autologous Chondrocytes for Nasal Augmentation: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

A Simple Combination Approach for Costal Cartilage Augmentation Rhinoplasty

Layered Composite Dorsal Onlay Implant for Augmentation Rhinoplasty

Injectable Cartilage Microtissue Regenerated by Autologous Chondrocytes for Nasal Augmentation: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Experimental Study on the Biological Outcome of Auricular Cartilage and Costal Cartilage at Different Time Periods After Autologous Cartilage Rhinoplasty

Three-dimensional analysis of autologous costal cartilage in Asian secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty

A Systematic Review of Technique, Satisfaction, and Complications of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Rhinoplasty

Use of human acellular dermal matrix in rhinoplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis