Evidence-based exercise prescription is facilitated by the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT)

Peter Kent,Peter B O’Sullivan,Jennifer Keating,Susan C Slade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097405
IF: 18.4793
2017-03-27
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:<sec id="s1"><st>Exercise interventions are poorly reported</st> <p>Exercise is effective for the prevention and management of acute and chronic health conditions. Exercise prescription is sensible when supported by high-quality evidence of effectiveness, and it is likely that the design of an exercise programme (eg, how long a person exercises each day, the duration of a programme, the level of intensity of the exercise) influences programme effectiveness. A meta-epidemiological review of 73 systematic reviews (1216 trials) of exercises reported that only 30% of trial reports provided information required to replicate the investigated exercise programme.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p> </sec> <sec id="s2"><st>Consequences of poor reporting</st> <p>This means that researchers would, in most cases, be unable to replicate and validate trial outcomes for exercise programmes that have been reported to be effective. In addition, clinicians would be unable to accurately implement treatment based on the reported intervention.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Furthermore, when trials of exercise are...
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?