Considerations when deriving compound-specific limits for extractables and leachables from pharmaceutical products: Four case studies
Patricia Parris,Elizabeth A Martin,Brad Stanard,Susanne Glowienke,David G Dolan,Kim Li,Ornella Binazon,Amanda Giddings,Geraldine Whelan,Melisa Masuda-Herrera,Joel Bercu,Thomas Broschard,Uma Bruen,Courtney M Callis,Cheryl L M Stults,Gregory L Erexson,Maureen T Cruz,Lee M Nagao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104802
Abstract:Leachables from pharmaceutical container closure systems are a subset of impurities that present in drug products and may pose a risk to patients or compromise product quality. Extractable studies can identify potential leachables, and extractables and leachables (E&Ls) should be evaluated during development of the impurity control strategy. Currently, there is a lack of specific regulatory guidance on how to risk assess E&Ls; this may lead to inconsistency across the industry. This manuscript is a cross-industry Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) consortium collaboration and follow-up to Broschard et al. (2016), which aims to provide further clarity and detail on the conduct of E&L risk assessments. Where sufficient data are available, a health-based exposure limit termed Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) may be calculated and to exemplify this, case studies of four common E&Ls are described herein, namely bisphenol-A, butylated hydroxytoluene, Irgafos® 168, and Irganox® 1010. Relevant discussion points are further explored, including the value of extractable data, how to perform route-to-route extrapolations and considerations around degradation products. By presenting PDEs for common E&L substances, the aim is to encourage consistency and harmony in approaches for deriving compound-specific limits.