An exploratory user study towards developing a unified, comprehensive assessment apparatus for deaf signers, specifically tailored for signing avatars evaluation: challenges, findings, and recommendations
Alfarabi Imashev,Nurziya Oralbayeva,Anara Sandygulova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20365-x
IF: 2.577
2024-10-30
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Abstract:Sign Languages (SL) are natural languages used by those who are deaf or have hearing impairments, as well as by hearing persons, including interpreters, family members, and friends of deaf individuals. Spoken languages rely primarily on verbal and written communication, whereas sign language focuses mainly on visual-gestural communication. In their daily lives, unimodal users (deaf people who only use sign language) cannot always rely solely on textual communication. Research on SL recognition and generation has shown enormous promise in addressing concerns related to inclusivity and accessibility. The research on using signing avatars in human-computer interaction is relatively new. The currently available information suggests that the research strategies used to develop sign language-interpreting avatars have drawbacks that hinder the establishment of a strong, dependable, and persuasive signing system. Therefore, to ensure the meaningful involvement of the deaf population in user studies, it is essential to design a standardized procedure for surveying them and acquiring significant insights to assist future improvements. In order to accomplish this objective, we undertook a thorough examination of several scales and metrics, which we endeavored to precisely customize and modify to suit the subjective assessment of SL agents by deaf signers. We conducted this analysis as an exploratory case study involving deaf signers and individuals who use sign language oftentimes. We aimed to address the question: "What should a methodological framework for evaluating sign language agents by deaf signers entail?" The data obtained from both rounds of this preliminary exploratory user study, as outlined in the current paper, became essential for our future work. During the COVID-19 lockdown period in 2020-2021, we conducted the first iteration solely online. We held the second iteration after a year, still adhering to the limitations imposed by the pandemic.
computer science, information systems, theory & methods,engineering, electrical & electronic, software engineering