Abstract:In an effort to responsibly incorporate evidence based on single-case designs (SCDs) into the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence base, the WWC assembled a panel of individuals with expertise in quantitative methods and SCD methodology to draft SCD standards. In this article, the panel provides an overview of the SCD standards recommended by the panel (henceforth referred to as the Standards) and adopted in Version 1.0 of the WWC’s official pilot standards. The Standards are sequentially applied to research studies that incorporate SCDs. The design standards focus on the methodological soundness of SCDs, whereby reviewers assign the categories of Meets Standards, Meets Standards With Reservations, and Does Not Meet Standards to each study. Evidence criteria focus on the credibility of the reported evidence, whereby the outcome measures that meet the design standards (with or without reservations) are examined by reviewers trained in visual analysis and categorized as demonstrating Strong Evidence, Moderate Evidence, or No Evidence. An illustration of an actual research application of the Standards is provided. Issues that the panel did not address are presented as priorities for future consideration. Implications for research and the evidence-based practice movement in psychology and education are discussed. The WWC’s Version 1.0 SCD standards are currently being piloted in systematic reviews conducted by the WWC. This document reflects the initial standards recommended by the authors as well as the underlying rationale for those standards. It should be noted that the WWC may revise the Version 1.0 standards based on the results of the pilot; future versions of the WWC standards can be found at http://www.whatworks.ed.gov .

Publishing Single-Case Research Design Studies That Do Not Demonstrate Experimental Control

A review of counseling research using single‐case research design

Replication Research and Special Education

The Iterative Use of Single Case Research Designs to Advance the Science of EI/ECSE

Single-Case Design, Analysis, and Quality Assessment for Intervention Research

Estimating the Impact of Design Standards on the Rigor of a Subset of Single-Case Research

Replication of Special Education Research

Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards

Prevalence of Research Design in Special Education: A Survey of Peer-Reviewed Journals

Initial Evidence of Research Quality of Registered Reports Compared to the Traditional Publishing Model

How Should We Determine Treatment Effectiveness with Single-Case Design Research for Participants with Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Is Developing Scientific Thinking All About Learning to Control Variables?

Registered reports and replications: An ongoing Journal of School Psychology initiative

An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports

A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check

A Description of Missing Data in Single-Case Experimental Designs Studies and an Evaluation of Single Imputation Methods

Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?

A critical scientific evaluation of a purportedly negative data report – response to Seneviratne et al. 2022

Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials – A Primer for Researchers

A Comparison of Single-Case Effect Measures Using Check-In Check-Out Data

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Publication Types in Quality Improvement Journals