Abstract:PurposeEcoinvent applies a method for estimation of default standard deviations for flow data from characteristics of these flows and the respective processes that are turned into uncertainty factors in a pedigree matrix, starting from qualitative assessments. The uncertainty factors are aggregated to the standard deviation. This approach allows calculating uncertainties for all flows in the ecoinvent database. In ecoinvent 2 the uncertainty factors were provided based on expert judgment, without (documented) empirical foundation. This paper presents (1) a procedure to obtain an empirical foundation for the uncertainty factors that are used in the pedigree approach and (2) a proposal for new uncertainty factors, received by applying the developed procedure. Both the factors and the procedure are a result of a first phase of an ecoinvent project to refine the pedigree matrix approach. A separate paper in the same edition, also the result of the aforementioned project, deals with extending the developed approach to other probability distributions than lognormal (Muller et al.).MethodsUncertainty is defined here simply as geometric standard deviation (GSD) of intermediate and elementary exchanges at the unit process level. This fits to the lognormal probability distribution that is assumed as default in ecoinvent 2, and helps to overcome scaling effects in the analysed data. In order to provide the required empirical basis, a broad portfolio of data sources is analysed; it is especially important to consider sources outside of the ecoinvent database to avoid circular reasoning. The ecoinvent pedigree matrix from version 2 is taken as a starting point, skipping the indicator “sample size” since it will not be used in ecoinvent 3. This leads to a pedigree matrix with five data quality indicators, each having five score values. The analysis is conducted as follows: for each matrix indicator and for each data source, indicator scores are set in relation to data sets, building groups of data sets that represent the different data quality indicator scores in the pedigree matrix. The uncertainty in each of the groups is calculated. The uncertainty obtained for the group with the ideal indicator score is set as a reference, and uncertainties for the other groups are set in relation to this reference uncertainty. The obtained ratio will be different from 1, it represents the unexplained uncertainty, additional uncertainty due to a lower data quality, and can be directly used as uncertainty factor candidates.Results and discussionThe developed approach was able to derive empirically based uncertainty factor candidates for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Uncertainty factors were obtained for all data quality indicators and for almost all indicator scores in the matrix. The factors are the result of the first analysis of several data sources, further analyses and discussions should be used to strengthen their empirical basis. As a consequence, the provided uncertainty factors can change in future. Finally, a few of the qualitative score descriptions in the pedigree matrix left room for interpretation, making their application not ambiguous.Conclusions and perspectivesAn empirical foundation for the uncertainty factors in the pedigree matrix overcomes one main argument against their use, which in turn strengthens the whole pedigree approach for quantitative uncertainty assessment in ecoinvent. This paper provides an approach to obtain an empirical basis for the uncertainty factors, and it provides also empirically based uncertainty factors, for indicator scores in the pedigree matrix. Basic uncertainty factors are not provided, it is recommended to use the factors from ecoinvent 2 for the time being. In the developed procedure, using GSD as the uncertainty measure is essential to overcome scaling effects; it should therefore also be used if the analysed data do not follow a lognormal distribution. As a consequence, uncertainty factors obtained as GSD ratios need to be translated to range estimators relevant for these other distributions. Formulas for this step are provided in a separate paper (Muller et al.). The work presented in this paper could be the starting point for a much broader study to provide a better basis for input uncertainty in LCA, not only in ecoinvent.

Effects of Distribution Choice on the Modeling of Life Cycle Inventory Uncertainty: An Assessment on the Ecoinvent v2.2 Database

The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in ecoinvent v3

Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent

Investigating transparency regarding ecoinvent users’ system model choices

The ecoinvent database version 3 (part II): analyzing LCA results and comparison to version 2

The Influence of Database Selection on Environmental Impact Results. Life Cycle Assessment of Packaging Using GaBi, Ecoinvent 3.6, and the Environmental Footprint Database

Life Cycle Assessment under Uncertainty: A Scoping Review

The integration of long-term marginal electricity supply mixes in the ecoinvent consequential database version 3.4 and examination of modeling choices

How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies?

Stochastic error propagation with independent probability distributions in LCA does not preserve mass balances and leads to unusable product compositions—a first quantification

Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts

Regionalizing the supply chain in process life cycle inventory with multiregional input–output data: An implementation for ecoinvent with EXIOBASE

Parameterization in Life Cycle Assessment inventory data: review of current use and the representation of uncertainty

Impact of Uncertainty Parameter Distribution on Robust Decision Making Outcomes for Climate Change Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty

Estimating the uncertainty of the greenhouse gas emission accounts in global multi-regional input–output analysis

Uncertainty in dynamic econometric input-output models: a Norwegian case study

The importance of uncertainty sources in LCA for the reliability of environmental comparisons: A case study on public bus fleet electrification

Statistical Based Approach for Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment: a Case Study in Textile Industry.

Life cycle inventories of electricity supply through the lens of data quality: exploring challenges and opportunities

Modelling Global Fossil CO2 Emissions with a Lognormal Distribution: A Climate Policy Tool

Modeling the Amount of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Application: New Modified Alpha Power Weibull-X Family of Distributions