Insight on Exercise-Induced Heart Remodeling in Different Track and Field Disciplines
Giuseppe Di Gioia,Armando Ferrera,Francesca Vespasiano,Viviana Maestrini,Sara Monosilio,Erika Lemme,Andrea Serdoz,Federica Mango,Emanuele Casciani,Antonio Pelliccia,Maria Rosaria Squeo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206027
IF: 3.9
2024-10-11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: The foot racing disciplines include sprints, middle distances, and long distances, which vary in terms of intensities, duration of training, and metabolic demands. The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in morpho-functional parameters describing cardiac remodeling in a large cohort of Olympic athletes practicing the different track subspecialties. Methods: We evaluated 140 track and field (52.1% males, mean age 26.3 ± 4.3 years) Olympic athletes divided into four groups according to the distance performed: Group A (46, 32.9%): 100 and 200 mt; Group B (34, 24.3%): 400 mt; Group C (25, 17.9%): 800, 1500, and 3000 mt; Group D (35, 24.9%): 5000, 10,000 mt, and marathon distance. The athletes underwent a pre-participation screening, which included transthoracic echocardiography and exercise stress testing. Results: In Group A and in Group B, most athletes presented normal cardiac geometry (41/46, 89.1% in Group A and 31/34, 91.2% in Group B, p < 0.0001). Instead, in Groups C and D, more than half presented eccentric cardiac remodeling (13\25, 52% in Group C and 23\35, 65.7% in Group D). No significant differences were found between subspecialties in LVEF (p = 0.587), diastolic function (p = 0.431), and training hours/week (p = 0.078). Conclusions: In conclusion, the presence and extent of cardiac remodeling vary according to the distance of the discipline practiced, with the largest dimensional increase in both left and right ventricles and atria in mid- and long-distance runners and the lowest in sprinters.
medicine, general & internal