Abstract:BACKGROUND Antisocial personality features in adolescents are frequently associated with delinquency and constitute the problem that most concerns the criminal justice system and the public. Hostile interpretation bias has been identified as a candidate for explaining emergent adolescent antisocial personality problems and aggression, but it is unclear whether offenders and non-offenders show differences in the relationships between hostile interpretation bias, aggression and antisocial personality features. AIMS To compare relationships between hostile interpretation bias and a personality measure between incarcerated teenagers and first year university students and to explore aggression and criminal history as mediating or moderating variables. METHODS Fifty-three 16-18-year-old incarcerated male offenders and 69 17-20-year-old male university students were recruited, the former through institutional staff and the latter by online advert only. Individuals in both groups self-rated, in private, on the Word and Sentence Association Paradigm-hostile (WSAP), The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Hostility Interpretation Bias Task (HIBT) as tests for hostile interpretation bias, and on the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and on Hyler's Personality Disorder Questionnaire (PDQ-4). Among the students, criminal history was assessed by a self-reported binary question. LASSO regressions were used to test inter-relationships between hostile interpretation bias and aggression or antisocial personality traits. Mediation and moderation were tested using MPLUS 7.4. RESULTS The WSAP and AIHQ, as measures of self-reported hostility bias, had relationships with self-reported aggression (Pearson r 0.24-0.58, p < 0.001) and with antisocial personality features (r 0.36-0.50, p < 0.001), the HIBT did not. Aggression scores mediated the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features. Furthermore, the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and aggression was stronger among the young offenders (estimates 0.43-0.75) than among the university students without criminal history (estimates 0.13-0.36). CONCLUSIONS Hostile interpretation bias appears to promote antisocial personality features by increasing an individual's aggression, regardless of social status, although the effect was much stronger among the young offenders. To reduce young people's antisocial personality features, future studies should perhaps focus on evaluating strategies to reduce hostile bias or prevent it from being expressed in aggressive behaviours.

Is Arson an Aggressive Act or a Property Offence? A Controlled Study of Psychiatric Referrals

Arson in mentally ill and criminal populations.

[Arson and pyromania, update 2015]

No . 236 Arson : Exploring Motives and Possible Solutions

A typology of rural arsonists: characterising patterns of criminal behaviour

Pathological fire-setting 1951-1991: a review

Unraveling the Inferno: An Arson Case Series

A firearm double homicide committed by a paranoid neigh- bor: a psychopathological study

Single versus multiple firesetting: an examination of demographic, behavioural and psychological factors

Mapping the Labyrinth of Forensic Evidence in Suspected Arson Case

The effectiveness of psychological interventions for adults who set fires: A systematic review

Narcissism, self-concept clarity and aggressive cognitive bias amongst mentally disordered offenders

Suicidal behavior among Finnish fire setters

Cognitive predictors of violent incidents in forensic psychiatric inpatients

Location, location, location: predictors and risk factors associated with adolescents referred for firesetting at home and away from home

Pervasive developmental disorders and criminal behaviour: a case control study

Psychiatric Risk Factors and Burn Severity in Self-Immolation

Klinefelter syndrome and fire setting behaviors: a case report and scoping review

The forensic examination of structural fires in Victoria, Australia: Decision-making processes and impact on judicial outcomes

A comparison of the role of aggression in the association between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features between young offenders and university students.

Profiling Homicides Based on Impulsive or Proactive Natures in Male Schizophrenia Patients