Abstract:Several theoretical frameworks have attempted to illustrate the influence of social contexts on decision-making and well-being. Traditional economic models assume that absolute income is the crucial determinant of one's well-being, while the comparative models state that social comparisons influence and even determine well-being and decisions. Here we investigated the impact of social comparisons on decision-making using a modified three-player Ultimatum Game and ERP technique. We found two independent effects: First, social comparisons did not affect decision-making when a fair norm was enforced. Second, social comparisons affected fairness consideration for unfair offers only—responders were less likely to accept unfair offers in upward comparisons but more likely to accept unfair offers in downward comparisons. These results revealed that people were envy-free of fair offers while affected mainly by social comparisons when the equality norm was broken. Event-related brain potentials showed that in the early time window (260–320 ms), compared to fair offers, unfair offers elicited a larger negative-going medial frontal negativity (MFN) in upward than parallel and downward comparisons, and in the late stage (320–650 ms), compared to fair offers, unfair offers led to equally less positive-going P300 in upward and downward comparisons relative to parallel comparison. Although partly consistent with the relative standing assumption, both traditional economic models and comparative models require revision to account for the results.

An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining

Adaptive Learning Versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining

Fairness in Multi-Proposer-Multi-Responder Ultimatum Game

Reputational Bargaining with Ultimatum Opportunities

Evolution and the Ultimatum Game

Uncertainty Reduces Rejections of Unfair Offers in the Ultimatum Game

Ultimatum game: regret or fairness?

Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective

Inequality Aversion or Reciprocity?——An Investigation of Two Kinds of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game

On Playing with Emotion: A Spatial Evolutionary Variation of the Ultimatum Game

Splitting The Difference In Incomplete‐Information Bargaining: Theory And Widespread Evidence From The Field

Evidence of general economic principles of bargaining and trade from 2,000 classroom experiments

Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior

The role of emotion regulation and choice repetition bias in the ultimatum game.

A Reactive-Darwinian Model for the ultimatum game: On the dominance of moderation in high diffusion

Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR IN TWO-PERSON GUESSING GAMES: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY1

Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game

Experimental Analysis of Impatience in Bilateral and Multilateral Negotiations

Degree-based assignation of roles in ultimatum games on scale-free networks

Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses