Abstract:Introduction The biopsychosocial model is generally considered the current gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of sexual disorders (Rullo et al, 2016). Shortcomings in how clinicians apply it remain. Given the model's importance to our field, we must periodically re-examine ways to optimize its strengths and minimize misapplication. This presentation encourages all to examine our understanding and application of the model so it remains adequately inclusive and robust for diagnosis and treatment. Doing so will remind clinicians of how they already use it productively but will also alert them to potential "blind spots" resulting from their specialized training and practice cultivated within their professions of origin. The biopsychosocial model must be a "stand-in" for all the predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining biological, medical/surgical, cognitive, behavioral, emotional, social, and cultural factors involved in the etiology and treatment of sexual disorders. The relevant aspects of those factors are best understood at a granular detail level that recognizes their proportional contribution to a given individual's sexual response. Most clinicians pay lip service to using a biopsychosocial approach, but too frequently, there is an overly exclusive focus on one or two aspects of the model, with insufficient awareness of other contributing factors. How many sex therapists offering diagnosis and treatment worldwide (typically aware of psychosocial nuances) are conversant with the impact of the biomedical diagnostic and treatment advances for cancers and chronic diseases, which may extend life but often result in diminished sexual function and satisfaction? How many know the latest benchwork discoveries and investigative techniques that improve understanding of drug interactions and mechanisms illuminating etiology? Reciprocally, do most physicians attend to the many cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and cultural factors contributing to or exacerbating a sexual disorder? How many physicians, when prescribing, inquire of the patient (or their partner) if the patient's goals for sexual activity are aligned with those of their partner? Physicians who prefer broader assessment find time limitations negating the potential for multilayered engagement. Finally, how many of us provide competent cultural awareness and sensitivity when evaluating and treating our patients? Telehealth is accelerating global access to patients, which creates an ever-increasing need for practitioner sensitivity to patient population differences. Many subscribe to a multidisciplinary model, whether working alone or in a team setting, but siloed thinking is still reinforced. There is increasing collegial respect, but perspectives remain separated. Therefore, it becomes incumbent upon all to mindfully seek continuing education opportunities (offered by our professional societies, etc.) to fill in the gaps we must recognize in our expertise. In applying our model, we must aspire to include recognition of all relevant factors, in effect leading to more comprehensive care while retaining the ease of use of the term "biopsychosocial." Objective Given the biopsychosocial model's importance to our field, we must periodically re-examine ways to optimize its strengths and minimize misapplication. Methods Expert opinion commentary. Results There are shortcomings in how clinicians apply the biopsychosocial model. Conclusions We must aspire to recognize and appreciate all relevant etiologic and treatment factors when applying our model, leading to more comprehensive care and greater patient and clinician satisfaction. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Palatin, Sprout, Pfizer, Roman, Mediflix, Kanna.

Queering the 7-eyed model of clinical supervision

Review of Clinical Supervision Models of Psychotherapy

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Supervision in a University-Based Training Clinic: A Case Study in Bridging the Gap Between Rigor and Relevance

Queer & kinky: what do queer BDSM practitioners need from psychosexual therapy to ensure their experience is relevant and inclusive?

Satir's Experiential Model Informed by Critical Theory: A Trans-Inclusive Case Study Analysis

Psychology trainee and supervisor perspectives of multicultural supervision.

Multi(ple) cultural voices speaking “Outside the Sentence” of counselling and psychotherapy

[Sexual minorities: Concepts, attitudes and structure for an appropriate psychotherapeutic approach]

The myth of the safe space: Sexual orientation disparities in therapist effectiveness.

A Model for Adapting Evidence-Based Interventions to Be LGBQ-Affirmative: Putting Minority Stress Principles and Case Conceptualization Into Clinical Research and Practice

The unspoken experiences of systemic supervisors of color: A modified Delphi study

Practicing as a postmodern supervisor

Repositioning Cultural Competency with Clinical Doctoral Students: Unpacking Intersectionality, Standpoint Theory, and Multiple Minority Stress/Resilience

Researching the “therapeutic relationship” in psychoanalysis, counselling psychology and psychotherapy—a qualitative inquiry

Clinical psychology, social identities and societal challenges: Implications for diversity-sensitive practice and training

Expanding the Lens: How SERT Therapists Develop Interventions that Address the Larger Context

(079) Encouraging A Greater Awareness Of All Relevant Factors When Sexual Medicine And Sex Therapy Clinicians Apply The Biopsychosocial Model

A consulting room with a view: Psychotherapy and the ecological context

When you are the “other”: A scoping review of the experiences of clinicians of color working with White clients.

Cross-Cultural Research on Psychotherapy: The Need for a Change

Resistance in Supervision: A Qualitative Study of Training Experiences Among Multiethnic Women