Liver Transplantation from Elderly Donors (≥85 Years Old)

Pierluigi Romano,Luis Cano,Daniel Pietrasz,Nassiba Beghdadi,Marc-Antoine Allard,Chady Salloum,Frédérique Blandin,Oriana Ciacio,Gabriella Pittau,René Adam,Daniel Azoulay,Antonio Sa Cunha,Eric Vibert,Luciano De Carlis,Alessandro Vitale,Umberto Cillo,Daniel Cherqui,Nicolas Golse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101803
2024-05-09
Cancers
Abstract:Background: Despite the ongoing trend of increasing donor ages in liver transplantation (LT) setting, a notable gap persists in the availability of comprehensive guidelines for the utilization of organs from elderly donors. This study aimed to evaluate the viability of livers grafts from donors aged ≥85 years and report the post-LT outcomes compared with those from "ideal" donors under 40 years old. Methods: Conducted retrospectively at a single center from 2005 to 2023, this study compared outcomes of LTs from donors aged ≥85 y/o and ≤40 y/o, with the propensity score matching to the recipient's gender, age, BMI, MELD score, redo-LT, LT indication, and cause of donor death. Results: A total of 76 patients received grafts from donors ≥85 y/o and were compared to 349 liver grafts from donors ≤40 y/o. Prior to PSM, the 5-year overall survival was 63% for the elderly group and 77% for the young group (p = 0.002). After PSM, the 5-year overall survival was 63% and 73% (p = 0.1). A nomogram, developed at the time of graft acceptance and including HCC features, predicted 10-year survival after LT using a graft from a donor aged ≥85. Conclusions: In the context of organ scarcity, elderly donors emerge as a partial solution. Nonetheless, without proper selection, LT using very elderly donors yields inferior long-term outcomes compared to transplantation from very young donors ≤40 y/o. The resulting nomogram based on pre-transplant criteria allows for the optimization of elderly donor/recipient matching to achieve satisfactory long-term results, in addition to traditional matching methods.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the feasibility of liver transplantation (LT) from elderly donors aged 85 and above, and compare it with the results of liver transplantation from young donors under 40 years old. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Evaluate the feasibility of liver transplantation from elderly donors**: Through a retrospective analysis of data from 2005 to 2023, the study explored the feasibility and long - term effects of using livers from elderly donors aged 85 and above for transplantation. 2. **Compare the transplantation results of donors of different ages**: The study compared the short - term and long - term survival rates and complication incidences after liver transplantation between elderly donors (≥85 years old) and young donors (≤40 years old). 3. **Develop a prediction model**: The study developed a nomogram based on a multivariate model to predict the 10 - year survival rate after liver transplantation using livers from elderly donors aged 85 and above. This nomogram takes into account various preoperative factors, such as the recipient's gender, age, BMI, MELD score, etc., to optimize the matching between elderly donors and recipients. 4. **Emphasize the importance of matching**: The study particularly emphasizes that in the case of organ scarcity, satisfactory long - term results can be achieved through appropriate matching methods (especially for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma). ### Main findings - **Results before matching**: Before propensity score matching (PSM), the 5 - year overall survival rate in the elderly group was 63%, while that in the young group was 77% (p = 0.002). - **Results after matching**: After PSM, the 5 - year overall survival rate in the elderly group was 63%, and that in the young group was 73% (p = 0.1). This indicates that with appropriate matching, the difference in transplantation results between elderly donors and young donors is not significant. - **Application of the nomogram**: The developed nomogram can predict the 10 - year survival rate after liver transplantation using livers from elderly donors aged 85 and above, which helps to optimize the matching between elderly donors and recipients. ### Conclusion In the case of organ scarcity, using livers from elderly donors aged 85 and above is a feasible solution. However, without appropriate matching, the transplantation results using very elderly donors may be worse than those using very young donors. Through the developed nomogram and existing matching methods, the matching between elderly donors and recipients can be optimized, thereby achieving satisfactory long - term results.