Abstract:Harnessing the power of microbial consortia is integral to a diverse range of sectors, from healthcare to biotechnology to environmental remediation. To fully realize this potential, it is critical to understand the mechanisms behind the interactions that structure microbial consortia and determine their functions. Constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) approaches, employing genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs), have emerged as the state-of-the-art tool to simulate the behavior of microbial communities from their constituent genomes. In the last decade, many tools have been developed that use COBRA approaches to simulate multi-species consortia under either steady-state, dynamic, or spatiotemporally varying scenarios. Yet, these tools have not been systematically evaluated regarding their software quality, most suitable application, and predictive power. Hence, it is uncertain which tools users should apply to their system and what are the most urgent directions that developers should take in the future to improve existing capacities. This study conducted a systematic evaluation of COBRA-based tools for microbial communities using datasets from two-member communities as test cases. First, we performed a qualitative assessment in which we evaluated 24 published tools based on a list of FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) features essential for software quality. Next, we quantitatively tested the predictions in a subset of 14 of these tools against experimental data from three different case studies: a) syngas fermentation by C. autoethanogenum and C. kluyveri for the static tools, b) glucose/xylose fermentation with engineered E. coli and S. cerevisiae for the dynamic tools, and c) a Petri dish of E. coli and S. enterica for tools incorporating spatiotemporal variation. Our results show varying performance levels of the best qualitatively assessed tools when examining the different categories of tools. The differences in the mathematical formulation of the approaches and their relation to the results were also discussed. Ultimately, we provide recommendations for refining future GEM microbial modeling tools.

Integration of proteomic data with genome‐scale metabolic models: A methodological overview

Protein constraints in genome‐scale metabolic models: Data integration, parameter estimation, and prediction of metabolic phenotypes

Toward Modeling Metabolic State from Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

An Integrative Bioinformatics Framework for Genome-scale Multiple Level Network Reconstruction of Rice

Using Genome-scale Models to Predict Biological Capabilities

Genome-scale models of bacterial metabolism: reconstruction and applications

Context-Specific Metabolic Networks Are Consistent with Experiments

Prediction and integration of metabolite-protein interactions with genome-scale metabolic models

Automation on the generation of genome scale metabolic models

Integration and Analysis of Omics Data Using Genome-Scale Metabolic Models

A Structured Evaluation of Genome-Scale Constraint-Based Modeling Tools for Microbial Consortia

COVRECON: Combining Genome-scale Metabolic Network Reconstruction and Data-driven Inverse Modeling to Reveal Changes in Metabolic Interaction Networks

Precise metabolic modeling in post-omics era: accomplishments and perspectives

MetaboTools: A Comprehensive Toolbox for Analysis of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models

Building kinetic models for metabolic engineering

COVRECON: automated integration of genome- and metabolome-scale network reconstruction and data-driven inverse modeling of metabolic interaction networks

Community‐scale models of microbiomes: Articulating metabolic modelling and metagenome sequencing

Modeling and interpretation of single-cell proteogenomic data

Development of integrating transcriptomic data into matebolic network analysis

The Time Is Right to Focus on Model Organism Metabolomes