Social capital and changes of psychologic distress during early stage of COVID-19 in New orleans

Kimberly Wu,Erica Doe,Gabriella D. Roude,Jasmine Wallace,Samantha Francois,Lisa Richardson,Katherine P. Theall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56249-1
IF: 4.6
2024-03-14
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Here we report on the relationship between measures of social capital, and their association with changes in self-reported measures of psychological distress during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyze data from an existing cluster randomized control trial (the Healthy Neighborhoods Project ) with 244 participants from New Orleans, Louisiana. Changes in self-reported scores between baseline (January 2019–March 2020) and participant's second survey (March 20, 2020, and onwards) are calculated. Logistic regression is employed to examine the association between social capital indicators and measures of psychological distress adjusting for key covariates and controlling for residential clustering effects. Participants reporting higher than average scores for social capital indicators are significantly less likely to report increases in psychosocial distress between pre and during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those who report higher than average sense of community were approximately 1.2 times less likely than those who report lower than average sense of community scores to experience increases in psychological distress before and during the global pandemic (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70,0.88, p ≤ 0.001), even after controlling for key covariates. Findings highlight the potentially important role that community social capital and related factors may play in the health of underrepresented populations during times of major stress. Specifically, the results suggest an important role of cognitive social capital and perceptions of community membership, belonging, and influence in buffering changes of mental health distress experienced during the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic among a sample of residents.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore the relationship between social capital (especially community belonging and collective efficacy) and the change in early - stage psychological distress during the COVID - 19 pandemic. Specifically, the study aims to analyze how different dimensions of social capital affect the changes in self - reported psychological distress and perceived stress among residents in low - income communities in New Orleans at the early stage of the pandemic. The study hypothesizes that residents with a higher level of social capital are less likely to experience an increase in psychological distress and perceived stress before and after the pandemic. ### Research Background - **Prevalence of mental health problems**: According to data from the National Institute of Mental Health in the United States, more than 57 million Americans suffer from mental illness. - **Mental health impacts during the pandemic**: An analysis of U.S. Census data by the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that from April 2020 to February 2021, the proportion of adults reporting symptoms of anxiety and depression increased from 35.9% to 39.3%. - **Racial and ethnic differences**: Studies have shown that Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) experienced higher levels of mental health stress, anxiety, depression, and worry during the pandemic. - **Importance of social support**: Research has pointed out that social support and social connections play an important role in alleviating mental health problems during disasters. ### Research Methods - **Sample selection**: The study used data from 244 New Orleans residents in the "Healthy Neighborhoods Project", which came from an existing cluster - randomized controlled trial. - **Data collection time**: Baseline data were collected from January 2019 to March 2020, and the second - round survey data were collected on and after March 20, 2020. - **Analysis method**: Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between social capital indicators and changes in psychological distress, adjusting for key covariates and controlling for residential clustering effects. ### Main Findings - **Impact of social capital**: Participants who reported higher social capital indicators were significantly less likely to report an increase in psychological distress. In particular, participants who reported a higher sense of community belonging were less likely to experience an increase in psychological distress than those who reported a lower sense of community belonging (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70, 0.88, p ≤ 0.001). - **Role of collective efficacy**: Higher neighborhood collective efficacy scores were also significantly associated with a significant reduction in the increase in psychological distress and perceived stress (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85, 0.95, p ≤ 0.001). ### Discussion - **Protective role of social capital**: The research results indicate that a higher sense of community belonging and collective efficacy can buffer mental health problems during the pandemic. - **Racial and gender differences**: Although the study did not analyze by racial and gender subgroups, the main sample was African - American female residents, which reflects the actual situation in low - income communities in New Orleans. - **Future research directions**: Further research is needed on the specific mechanisms of social capital, especially its role in different racial and ethnic groups. ### Conclusion This study emphasizes the important role of social capital in protecting mental health during the pandemic, especially in low - income communities severely affected by the pandemic. The research results provide an important reference for conducting more research in similar contexts in the future.