Abstract:Concerns about women’s work were present at the advent of the modern method of national income accounting, and they have featured prominently in the most radical critiques of this method. During and after the Second World War, Phyllis Deane, a young researcher working under the supervision of Richard Stone, Austin Robinson and Arthur Lewis, grappled with the conceptual difficulties involved in measuring the ‘national’ incomes of mostly rural subsistence colonies in British central Africa. In constructing her estimates, Deane relied heavily on a multidisciplinary survey of nutrition conducted in interwar Nyasaland. Deane’s work was essentially an exercise in reductionism and bounding; she sought to extract from these data a single monetary estimate of production. Yet Deane also proved unwilling to exclude too much. She broke with her advisors’ favoured convention that activities not involved in market exchange should be excluded from the national income. Successive national income accountants around the world would reach disparate conclusions on method, particularly on the question of the ‘production boundary’—that is, the dividing line between those productive activities that would be included in the national income and those that would not. This issue became most contentious in the sphere of ‘non-monetary’ or ‘subsistence’ production performed mostly by female producers. While some statisticians included firewood collection, beer brewing and cooking, many others thought such activities beyond the bounds of ‘the economy’. Early decisions about the status of non-monetary production influenced the international standards enshrined in the United Nations System of National Accounts, first published in 1953. Beginning in the 1970s, second-wave feminists criticised the invisibility of women’s work in national income estimates. These critiques helped spur the inclusion of non-monetary activities in the accounts of many nations. Yet by the 1990s, many feminist critics—most notably New Zealand-born political economist Marilyn Waring—sought to move beyond GDP as a measure of welfare. These feminists called instead for greater reliance on measures such as the Human Development Index and time-use surveys. These measures may have appeared new, but they required the same multidisciplinary and intensive methods as Nyasaland’s interwar nutrition survey, which had served as the substrate for the earliest calculation of a ‘colonial national’ income. Drawing upon archives in the United Kingdom, Malawi and the United States, this paper argues that feminist economists and women’s work were central to both the post-war construction and the late-twentieth century critique of national income.

Anna Doyle Wheeler: Gender Equality and the Need for a Cooperative Economic System

William Thompson and John Stuart Mill on co-operation and the rights of women

Gender equality, growth, and how a technological trap destroyed female work

Economic Policy—An Open-Systems Perspective: Institutions, Constraints, and Utopia

Gender and the future of macroeconomics: an evolutionary approach

Enduring inequalities: Fifty years of gender equality talk in the media and cultural industries

Elizabeth Gaskell: An overlooked political economist and proto theorist in the field of industrial relations

Explaining the Swedish ‘housewife era’ of 1930–1970: joint utility maximisation or renewed patriarchy?

Do Feminists Need an Economic Sociology of Law?

Outside the Economy: Women’s Work and Feminist Economics in the Construction and Critique of National Income Accounting

Gender and attitudes toward welfare state reform: Are women really social investment promoters?

Toward Gender Justice: Confronting Stratification and Unequal Power

Gender stereotypes and empowerment of women in energy cooperatives: A comparative analysis from Italy and Belgium

Why Women’s Power Matters

Collective models and the marriage market

Normative Versus Felt Needs of Women in the Era of Welfare Reform

"Human Beings Is What Women Want to Become, and to Partake of the Garland of Work and Victory." Visions of Emancipation, Community Spirit, and Social Reform in the First German Women's Movement

Women in Economic History

The Future of Agricultural Cooperatives

The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more Progressive Union

Sustaining the potential for cooperation as female competitive strategy