Abstract:Objective: Although it is known that intersurgeon variability in offering elective surgery can have major consequences for patient morbidity and healthcare spending, data addressing variability within neurosurgery are scarce. The authors performed a prospective peer review study of randomly selected neurosurgery cases in order to assess the extent of consensus regarding the decision to offer elective surgery among attending neurosurgeons across one large academic institution. Methods: All consecutive patients who had undergone standard inpatient surgical interventions of 1 of 4 types (craniotomy for tumor [CFT], nonacute redo CFT, first-time spine surgery with/without instrumentation, and nonacute redo spine surgery with/without instrumentation) during the period 2015-2017 were retrospectively enrolled (n = 9156 patient surgeries, n = 80 randomly selected individual cases, n = 20 index cases of each type randomly selected for review). The selected cases were scored by attending neurosurgeons using a need for surgery (NFS) score based on clinical data (patient demographics, preoperative notes, radiology reports, and operative notes; n = 616 independent case reviews). Attending neurosurgeon reviewers were blinded as to performing provider and surgical outcome. Aggregate NFS scores across various categories were measured. The authors employed a repeated-measures mixed ANOVA model with autoregressive variance structure to compute omnibus statistical tests across the various surgery types. Interrater reliability (IRR) was measured using Cohen's kappa based on binary NFS scores. Results: Overall, the authors found that most of the neurosurgical procedures studied were rated as "indicated" by blinded attending neurosurgeons (mean NFS = 88.3, all p values < 0.001) with greater agreement among neurosurgeon raters than expected by chance (IRR = 81.78%, p = 0.016). Redo surgery had lower NFS scores and IRR scores than first-time surgery, both for craniotomy and spine surgery (ANOVA, all p values < 0.01). Spine surgeries with fusion had lower NFS scores than spine surgeries without fusion procedures (p < 0.01). Conclusions: There was general agreement among neurosurgeons in terms of indication for surgery; however, revision surgery of all types and spine surgery with fusion procedures had the lowest amount of decision consensus. These results should guide efforts aimed at reducing unnecessary variability in surgical practice with the goal of effective allocation of healthcare resources to advance the value paradigm in neurosurgery.

Letter to editor : optimizing surgical approaches for anterior communicating artery aneurysms: development and internal validation of a novel surgical scoring system

Computational Surgical Planning Simulation of Intracranial Aneurysms with AneuPlan TM - An exploratory study

Evaluating innovation. Part 2: Development in neurosurgery

Letter to editor: Bridging the gap: robotic applications in cerebral aneurysms neurointerventions - a systematic review

Letter to editor: Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: Comparative systematic review and meta‐analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases

Surgical outcome of clipping in anterior circulation aneurysms

Microsurgery for intracranial aneurysms: A qualitative survey on technical challenges and technological solutions

Letter to the Editor: "Exploring optimal microscopic keyhole access to the skull base: an anatomical evaluation of transciliary supraorbital and transpalpebral orbitofrontal craniotomy approaches"

Advances in Cranial Surgery

Keyhole Alternatives to Pterional Craniotomy for the Microsurgical Clipping of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: Technical Pearls, Surgical Results, and a Case Selection Algorithm

Surgery or Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

"Navigating moyamoya: bridging gaps in neurocognitive outcomes through STA-ACA bypass"

Comment on - "Simulation training approaches in intracranial aneurysm surgery—a systematic review"

Individualised Evaluation Based on Pathophysiology for Moyamoya Vasculopathy: Application in Surgical Revascularisation.

Advancing aneurysm management: the potential of AI and machine learning in enhancing safety and predictive accuracy

Assessing variability in surgical decision making among attending neurosurgeons at an academic center

Development of a predictive grading system for postoperative ischemia following middle cerebral artery aneurysm clipping

Neuro Navigation Versus Conventional Spinal Techniques in Analyzing Nerve Injury and Anatomical Accuracy: A Systematic Review

Letter to editor: Volumetric segmentation in the context of posterior fossa‐related pathologies: a systematic review

Letter to the editor: "Management of cerebrospinal‐fluid‐related intracranial abnormalities in frontoethmoidal encephalocele using "Shunt algorithm for frontoethmoidal encephalocele" (SAFE), a retrospective cohort study of published cases"

External Validation of the Modified Southwestern Aneurysm Severity Index in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial Surgical Cohort