A nurse-driven penicillin allergy risk score in the preoperative setting was associated with increased cefazolin use perioperatively

Michael W. Tsoulis,Karen S. Hsu Blatman,Vinca W. Chow,Kathleen O. Stewart,Rebecca Wang,Erin L. Reigh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111443
IF: 9.375
2024-03-15
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Abstract:Study objective To characterize and assess the effects of a preoperative, nurse-driven penicillin allergy risk stratification tool on rates of perioperative cefazolin and second-line antibiotic use. Design Quasi-experimental quality improvement study of penicillin-allergic surgical patients undergoing procedures for which cefazolin is indicated. Setting Outpatient Perioperative Care Clinic (PCC) for preoperative surgical patients at a tertiary care center. Patients 670 and 1371 adult penicillin-allergic PCC attendants and non-attendants, respectively. Intervention A paper penicillin allergy risk stratification questionnaire was administered during the PCC visit. Nurses were educated on its use. Measurements Antibiotic (cefazolin, clindamycin, vancomycin) use rates in the 24 months before and 17 months after intervention implementation in November 2020 (November 2018 – April 2022) were assessed in penicillin-allergic PCC attendants with statistical process control charts. Multivariable logistic regression assessed antibiotic use rates pre- and post-intervention adjusting for age, sex, surgical specialty and penicillin allergy history severity. Similar analyses were done in penicillin-allergic PCC non-attendants. Main results Of 670 penicillin-allergic PCC attendants, 451 (median [IQR] age, 66 (Sousa-Pinto et al., 2021 [ 14 ])) were analyzed pre-intervention and 219 (median [IQR] age, 66 (Mine et al., 1970 [ 13 ])) post-intervention. One month after implementation, process measures demonstrated an upward shift in cefazolin use for PCC attendants versus no shift or other special cause variation for PCC non-attendants. There were increased odds of cefazolin use (aOR 1.67, 95% CI [1.09–2.57], P = 0.019), decreased odds of clindamycin use (aOR 0.61, 95% CI [0.42–0.89], P = 0.010) and decreased odds of vancomycin use (aOR 0.56, 95% CI [0.35–0.88], P = 0.013) in PCC attendants post-intervention. This effect did not occur in PCC non-attendants. There was no increase in perioperative anaphylaxis post-intervention. Conclusions A simple penicillin allergy risk stratification tool implemented in the preoperative setting was associated with increased use of cefazolin and decreased rates of second-line agents post implementation.
anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?