The Outcomes of Adenovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Hay Me Me,Sumi Nair,Carrie A. Schinstock,Tambi Jarmi,Nan Zhang,Pooja Budhiraja,Lavanya Kodali,Holenarasipur R. Vikram,Girish Mour
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14409
2024-11-22
Transplant Infectious Disease
Abstract:Adenovirus (ADV) infection in kidney and simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplant recipients, though rare, poses significant risks, including graft loss and rejection. This study emphasizes the importance of screening ADV in transplant patients presenting with renal dysfunction, particularly with hematuria and/or fever. Background Adenovirus (ADV) infection can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplants. The incidence of ADV infection in kidney transplant (KT) is not well‐defined as ADV is often asymptomatic and not routinely checked. Methods This retrospective case‐series study included KT and simultaneous pancreas‐KT (SPKT) recipients from January 1, 2008, to January 31, 2024, across three Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) with symptomatic adenovirus polymerase chain reaction cases. The primary outcomes were allograft function at various intervals post‐ADV infection, allograft, and patient survival. Results We report one of the largest multi‐site case series regarding outcomes of ADV in KT with 17 patients. The median time to ADV infection was 30 weeks (5–74). Five patients (29%) developed disseminated infection. Nine patients (53%) of the entire cohort experienced graft loss within a median of 35 (4–168) weeks, with four (44%) of graft loss attributed to ADV. Nine patients (53%) developed rejections post‐ADV infection with a median of 4 (2–8) weeks after resolution. One patient died from acute hypoxic respiratory failure from ADV infection. Conclusion ADV should be considered in KT/SPKT patients with renal dysfunction, hematuria, and with or without fever. Despite the low mortality rate, there is a significant risk of graft loss and rejection after ADV infection. It is crucial to screen for ADV and develop intervention strategies for treatment. Further multicenter studies are needed to better define, stage, and manage ADV infection.
immunology,infectious diseases,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?