Continuous improvement in the efficient use of energy in office buildings through peers effects

Patricia Gómez,Nazrul I. Shaikh,Murat Erkoc
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122646
IF: 11.2
2024-02-07
Applied Energy
Abstract:Extant research has highlighted the pros and cons of the use of (a) competition and (b) positive (peer) pressure as two mechanisms for invoking peer effects to bring about long-term behavior change. However, these mechanisms have been studied separately and in different contexts. In this paper, we compare the differential impacts of competition versus positive pressure-induced pro-environmental behavior change in the same target population. This study spans a seven-year horizon between 2013 and 2019 (pre-COVID) during which the workforce of about 2500 employees in the Stephan P. Clark Government Center in Miami, Florida, was split into four groups - one control and three treatment groups. Each treatment group was subjected to (a) a healthy inter-group competition through tracking, benchmarking, and comparing monthly group level electricity saving, and (b) positive pressure through the appointment of champions who encouraged pro-environmental behavior among their group members. Studying these mechanisms concurrently in the same population allows for a nuanced comparison of their differential impacts on pro-environmental behavior change.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?