Collaboration between mental health professionals and physicians in the assessment of torture victims in a conflict-ridden area: Complexities and recommendations.

Daniel J. N. Weishut,Rachel Rokach,Dorit Gurny,Bettina Steiner-Birmanns

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000546

2024-01-01

Abstract:Health professionals who jointly assess torture victims according to the Istanbul Protocol encounter a testimony of severe psychological and physical trauma. This encounter can arouse intense reactions toward the narrative, the victim, or health team members, complicating the collaboration. The present study explores the complexities of collaboration between physicians and mental health professionals interviewing traumatized torture victims. In the last decade, the authors conducted forensic evaluations of African asylum seekers and Palestinians alleging torture as part of an interdisciplinary team of volunteers in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. The study employs introspection and dialogue by the authors and identifies three recurrent themes: (a) discrepancies in professional culture, (b) power differentials between clinicians, and (c) countertransference issues. It then discusses these themes via vignettes, illuminating the complexities of the situation in which mental health professionals and physicians perform joint evaluations of victims of severe man-made trauma. Finally, it provides recommendations for effective collaboration through investing in team building by (a) developing trust between the clinicians, (b) planning the assessment, and (c) effective communication before, during, and afterward.

psychology, multidisciplinary