COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTENSIVE VERSUS STANDARD BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION

Chia-Te Liao,Han Siong Toh,Chun-Ting Yang,Dongmei Wei,Jesus Melgarejo,Zhih-Cherng Chen,Jhih-Yuan Shih,Zhen-Yu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000835764.57714.ea
IF: 4.9
2022-06-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:In the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial, Chinese patients aged 60 to 80 years who received intensive systolic blood-pressure control (target, 110 to 130 mmHg) had a significantly lower incidence rate of cardiovascular events than did those who received standard control (target 130 to 150 mmHg). Based on these data, we aimed to examine the lifetime cost-effectiveness of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control from the different healthcare providers’ perspectives. A microsimulation model was employed to apply STEP treatment effects and medical costs and utility from national sources or published data to a hypothetical cohort of STEP-eligible patients in China. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) against willing-to-pay threshold was used to evaluate whether intensive versus standard blood-pressure control was a cost-effective option. A series of sensitivity, subgroup, and scenario analyses in other countries (the US and UK) were performed to account for the generalisability and uncertainties arising from study assumptions and parameters. The ICER values of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control were approximate ¥ 48,000, $32,300, £10,055 per QALY gained from the perspective of healthcare providers in China, the US and the UK. Simulation results indicated that intensive treatment would be cost-effective (54.6% and 70.1% below the willing-to-pay thresholds of ¥ 80,000 and ¥240,000). The scenario analyses presented that intensive treatment would be cost-effective in the US and UK settings (63.9% and 80.4% below the willing-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $150,000 in the US; 75% and 82.1% below the willing-to-pay thresholds of £30,000 and £90,000 in the UK) In this simulation study, intensive blood-pressure control in the older Chinese population produced fewer cardiovascular events and acceptable costs per QALY gained, commonly below the willing-to-pay threshold. Given the STEP treatment effects in other populations, the cost-effectiveness of intensive blood-pressure control in older patients was likely consistent across different countries.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?