Abstract:Accurate computational predictions of band gaps are of practical importance to the modeling and development of semiconductor technologies, such as (opto)electronic devices and photoelectrochemical cells. Among available electronic-structure methods, density-functional theory (DFT) with the Hubbard U correction (DFT+U) applied to band edge states is a computationally tractable approach to improve the accuracy of band gap predictions beyond that of DFT calculations based on (semi)local functionals. At variance with DFT approximations, which are not intended to describe optical band gaps and other excited-state properties, DFT+U can be interpreted as an approximate spectral-potential method when U is determined by imposing the piecewise linearity of the total energy with respect to electronic occupations in the Hubbard manifold (thus removing self-interaction errors in this subspace), thereby providing a (heuristic) justification for using DFT+U to predict band gaps. However, it is still frequent in the literature to determine the Hubbard U parameters semiempirically by tuning their values to reproduce experimental band gaps, which ultimately alters the description of other total-energy characteristics. Here, we present an extensive assessment of DFT+U band gaps computed using self-consistent ab initio U parameters obtained from density-functional perturbation theory to impose the aforementioned piecewise linearity of the total energy. The study is carried out on 20 compounds containing transition-metal or p-block (group III-IV) elements, including oxides, nitrides, sulfides, oxynitrides, and oxysulfides. By comparing DFT+U results obtained using nonorthogonalized and orthogonalized atomic orbitals as Hubbard projectors, we find that the predicted band gaps are extremely sensitive to the type of projector functions and that the orthogonalized projectors give the most accurate band gaps, in satisfactory agreement with experimental data. This work demonstrates that DFT+U may serve as a useful method for high-throughput workflows that require reliable band gap predictions at moderate computational cost.

Orbital-Resolved DFT +U for Molecules and Solids

Orbital-resolved DFT+U for molecules and solids

Noncollinear DFT+$U$ and Hubbard parameters with fully-relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotentials

Modeling the self-energy and wavefunction relaxation in the orbitals

Self-consistent on-site and inter-site Hubbard parameters within DFT+U+V for UO$_2$ using density-functional perturbation theory

Explicit demonstration of the equivalence between DFT+U and the Hartree-Fock limit of DFT+DMFT

Extensive Benchmarking of DFT+U Calculations for Predicting Band Gaps

High-throughput determination of Hubbard and Hund values for transition metal oxides via the linear response formalism

Communication: Comparing Ab Initio Methods of Obtaining Effective U Parameters for Closed-Shell Materials

DFT+ within the framework of linear combination of numerical atomic orbitals

A Self-consistent DFT+DMFT scheme in the Projector Augmented Wave : Applications to Cerium, Ce2O3 and Pu2O3 with the Hubbard I solver and comparison to DFT+U

Implementation of time-dependent Hartree Fock in real space

A new DFT method for atoms and molecules in Cartesian grid

DFT+U+J with linear response parameters predicts non-magnetic oxide band gaps with hybrid-functional accuracy

Orbital-Free DFT Correctly Models Quantum Dots When Asymptotics, Nonlocality and Nonhomogeneity Are Accounted For

Machine learning the Hubbard U parameter in DFT+U using Bayesian optimization

Orbital densities functional

Minimum tracking linear response Hubbard and Hund corrected Density Functional Theory in CP2K

Molecular orbital projectors in non-empirical jmDFT recover exact conditions in transition metal chemistry

Machine learning Hubbard parameters with equivariant neural networks

Structure and energetics of solvated ferrous and ferric ions: Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics in the DFT+U formalism