On Some Points in the Clinical History of Chorea‡
W. Gowers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.900.447
1878-03-30
British Medical Journal
Abstract:condition seems to have attracted notice. Lepine says of his case of abscess of the right frontal lobe: "He was in a state of hebetude. He seemed to comprehend what was said, but could scarcely be got to utter a word. He would sit down when he was told to do so, and when taken up could walk a few steps with assistance." A very interesting case is reported by Baraduc,* in which there was atrophy of the frontal convolutions in both hemispheres. The patient was an inmate of the Hospice de Me'nages for six years. His muscular powers and sensation were unimpaired. He was, however, in a state of complete dementia, marching about restlessly the whole day, picking up what came in his way, mute, and quite oblivious of all the wants of nature, and requiring to be tended like a child. The lesion in this case was purely cortical, atrophic, and dependent on partial obliteration of the arterial supply. The lesion occupied the two anterior lobes, that is to say, the first, second, and third frontal convolutions, and also the internal aspect of the frontal lobes. The ascending frontal, ascending parietal, and paracentral convolutions were intact. The rest of the brain was normal, except in the region of the inferior parietal lobule of the right hemisphere (supramarginal and angular gyrus). Another case, presenting several interesting features, has been put on record by Dr. Davidson.t A labourer received a severe blow on the head with an iron hook, which smashed and carried away a considerable portion of the frontal bone, exposing and injuring the brain as far back as the coronal suture. The injured portion of the brain, as determined post mortem, included, on the right side, the greater part of the superior and middle frontal convolutions ; and on the left side, a piece of bone was found firmly adherent to the superior frontal convolution at its, middle part, this part being disintegrated to the depth of an inch or so. With the exception of a spasmodic extension of the right arm occasionally, the only symptoms of the cerebral lesion in this case were of a psychical nature. Though the man seemed to understand what was said to him and did what he was told, "every action he performed left the impression on the mind of the observer that it was purely automatic" or machine-like. Marked mental deficiency has been frequently noted in connection with arrested development, or atrophy, of the frontal lobes, without any objective symptoms as regards motility or sensibility. One good instance of this has been described and figured by Cruveilhier. This was a case of a girl aged I5, who had remained in a complete state of idiocy from birth. The prefrontal regions or anterior two-thirds of the frontal lobes in this case were completely wanting. But, indeed, the frequent association of idiocy with such defect of the frontal lobes is a generally recognised fact. Whatever opinion we may form as to the positive indications of disease of the prefrontal lobes, I think it is abundantly manifest, from the cases I have cited from among many, that, in the total absence of affections of motility or sensibility, whether in connection with sudden or slowly progressive lesions of these regions, we cannot attach objective motor or sensory functions to them. With such evidence before us, to say nothing of the facts of experimental physiology, we cannot regard cases in which, with lesions in the prefrontal lobes, sensation or motion has been affected, as other than cases of co-existence or multiple lesions, whether organic or functional. Between lesions of the prefrontal lobes and such symptoms, we have no grounds for assuming even indirect causal relationship, unless they can be shown to be of very frequent, if not constant, occurrence. Such relationship we all admit in the case of tumours, which, as we know, influence regions at a distance from the actual seat of disease ; or in the case of diseases spreading backwards, such as encephalitis or meningitis. It is chiefly on the indirect or accessory symptoms that we at present rely for our diagnosis of lesions in the frontal regions. We may obtain indications from the history of some traumatic lesion, or from the proximity of some such affection as disease of the nasal foss?e ; or we may have uncertain signs of pain localised in the frontal region; or there may be disturbances of the sense of smell. But, in the absence of all these-and they may be absent-the question is : whether there are any symptoms directly indicating disease of the prefrontal lobes ? Even if we have to admit that such symptoms cannot be definitely specified, yet it will not have been in vain if experimental physiology has succeeded in bringing into prominence certain facts to which attention should be more particularly paid in future. Touching the effects of removal of the prefrontal lobes in monkeys, I may be allowed to quote from myself: " Removal or destruction by the cautery of the antero-frontal lobes is not followed by any definite physiological results. The animals retain their appetites and instincts, and are capable of exhibiting emotional feeling. The sensory faculties, sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell, remain unimpaired. The powers of voluntary motion are retained in their integrity, and there is little to indicate the presence of such an extensive lesion, or a removal of so large a part of the brain And yet, notwithstanding this apparent absence of physiological symptoms, I could perceive a very decided alteration in the animals' character and behaviour, though it is difficult to state in precise terms the nature of the change. The animals opemted on were selected on account of their intelligent character. After the operation, though they might seem to one who had not compared their present with their past fairly up to the average of monkey intelligence, they had undergone a considerable psychological alteration. Instead of, as before, being actively interested in their surroundings, and curiously prying into all that came within the field of their observation, they remained apathetic or dull, or dozed off to sleep, responding only to the sensations or impressions of the moment, or varying their listlessness with restless and purposeless wanderings to and fro. While not actually deprived of intelligence, they had lost, to all appearance, the faculty of attentive and intelligent observation."* I have elsewhere attempted some explanation of the faculty of attention-the basis of the higher intellectual operations-and its relation to the anatomical substrata of the prefrontal lobes ; but I will not enter further on these speculations at present. I would, however, call your attention to the psychical characters in some of the cases of disease and injury of the frontal lobes to which I have referred (e. g., the American "Crowbar" case, Baraduc's, Selwyn's, Lepine's, Davidson's), as, in many respects, similar to those seen in monkeys after removal of the prefrontal lobes. I may also adduce the observation of Dr. Crichton Browne on General Paralysis of the Insane,t tending to show that the earlier symptoms, inter alia " general restlessness and unsteadiness of mind, with impairment of attention, alternating with apathy and drowsiness" (page 223), coincide with the morbid changes occurring at this stage, more particularly in the frontal regions.