Abstract:Purpose This study aims to explore the strategies corporations use in engaging stakeholders to sustain healthy corporate partnerships and create value for the corporate entity and the society in which they operate and their influence on the corporate manager's cognitive abilities and decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The authors used an interpretive research approach leveraging the strengths of qualitative method of content analysis and comparative and critical analyses to report the results. Interpretive methods incorporate social theories and standpoints that view reality as the social construction of understandable events in the context of organizational communication. Findings The findings of this study suggest that corporations are assumed to follow and execute the principles of engaging stakeholders to achieve corporate social responsibility (CSR) claiming to manage a sustainable and responsible business practices that recognize local cultures, human rights and protect the environment. However, little attention has been paid to the cognitive reasoning of the individuals responsible for CSR and corporate sustainability (CS) as opposed to the growing concerns about strategies corporations use in engaging stakeholders to sustain healthy corporate partnerships and create value – especially the processes that take place during engagement and decision-making including cognitive offloading. Practical implications Stakeholder engagement requires practical approaches that enable corporations and individuals charged with decision-making responsibilities to understand, respond and fulfill their CSRs. To achieve CSRs, corporations and managers responsible for relevant decision-making would need to involve stakeholders in social performance planning, as social reporting/auditing has long been advocating for preventing managerial biasness, groupthink and increased information dissemination via detailed reporting practices toward more collaborative stakeholder relationships. Thus, it is crucial for corporations to implement enhanced stakeholder and managerial decision-making strategies such as integrative approaches to achieve balance in the trio elements of sustainability as well as the growing use of paradox perspective to understand the nature of the tensions being sought to balance and, in the process, provide opportunity for a better evaluation of complex sustainability issues for innovative approach to resolving them. While cognitive decision-making is at play, in practice, managers tasked with making decisions must ensure the most effective stakeholder engagement strategies that are transparent and inclusive are used. Originality/value The main contribution of this study is its argument regarding the tools corporations use in engaging key stakeholders and the cognitive reasoning of the individuals responsible for CSR and CS. The study further contributes to interpreting the integrative approach to achieving balance in the trio elements of sustainability as well as the growing use of paradox perspective to understand the nature of the tensions being sought to balance and, in the process, provide an opportunity for a better evaluation of complex sustainability issues for an innovative approach to resolving them.

Exploring Managers’ Perceptions on Stakeholders’ Attributes in ESG Reporting of Malaysian Companies

Stakeholders' perspectives on critical success factors for environmental social and governance (ESG) implementation

The Influence of External Stakeholders on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: Toward a Conceptual Framework for ESG Disclosure

The influence of stakeholder on a company's sustainable practice: Insights from the Japanese perspective

Factors Affecting Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting: A Literature Review

Improving Corporate Performance through Stakeholder-Based ESG Practices

Evaluating the effects of environmental management practices on environmental and financial performance of firms in Malaysia: the mediating role of ESG disclosure

Is Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Value Enhancing? Evidence from Top 100 Companies

The influence of corporate governance structure on sustainability reporting in Malaysia

Understanding Multi-stakeholder Complexity & Developing a Causal Recipe (fsQCA) for achieving Sustainable Ecotourism

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting/ Communication Matter? Employees’ Perception of the Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage of Banking Corporations

Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance

Impact of stakeholder engagement strategies on managerial cognitive decision-making: the context of CSP and CSR

The impact of female representation and ethnic diversity in committees on environmental, social and governance performance in Malaysia

Management Systems And The Csr Engagement

Accounting for Society: Examining the Interplay between Financial Reporting and Social Responsibility

The Impact of External Stakeholders’ Pressures on the Intention to Adopt Environmental Management Practices and the Moderating Effects of Firm Size

Stakeholder influences on management control systems for ESG governance and reporting in the global automotive industry

The Interlink between Stakeholder Influence and Sustainable Practices: A Case Study of Thai Agriculture Enterprise

Does the sustainability committee matter in the efficacy of sustainability reporting and firm performance?

Online Environmental Reporting: Does Ownership Structure Matter?