Optimal social distancing in epidemic control: cost prioritization, adherence and insights into preparedness principles

Giulio Pisaneschi,Matteo Tarani,Giovanni Di Donato,Alberto Landi,Marco Laurino,Piero Manfredi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54955-4
IF: 4.6
2024-02-23
Scientific Reports
Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic experience has highlighted the importance of developing general control principles to inform future pandemic preparedness based on the tension between the different control options, ranging from elimination to mitigation, and related costs. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing has been confirmed to be the critical response tool until vaccines become available. Open-loop optimal control of a transmission model for COVID-19 in one of its most aggressive outbreaks is used to identify the best social distancing policies aimed at balancing the direct epidemiological costs of a threatening epidemic with its indirect (i.e., societal level) costs arising from enduring control measures. In particular, we analyse how optimal social distancing varies according to three key policy factors, namely, the degree of prioritization of indirect costs, the adherence to control measures, and the timeliness of intervention. As the prioritization of indirect costs increases, (i) the corresponding optimal distancing policy suddenly switches from elimination to suppression and, finally, to mitigation; (ii) the "effective" mitigation region—where hospitals' overwhelming is prevented—is dramatically narrow and shows multiple control waves; and (iii) a delicate balance emerges, whereby low adherence and lack of timeliness inevitably force ineffective mitigation as the only accessible policy option. The present results show the importance of open-loop optimal control, which is traditionally absent in public health preparedness, for studying the suppression–mitigation trade-off and supplying robust preparedness guidelines.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to balance the direct epidemiological costs (such as hospitalization, death, etc.) and the indirect social costs (such as economic impact, damaged social relations, etc.) through social isolation measures in epidemic control. Specifically, the paper explores how the optimal social isolation strategies change by analyzing three key policy factors - the priority of indirect costs, compliance with control measures, and the timeliness of intervention. These strategies include different control options such as elimination, suppression, and mitigation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical basis and guiding principles for future epidemic preparedness. The paper uses the open - loop optimal control method. By establishing an infectious disease transmission model that includes possible policy actions and combining appropriate cost functions for direct and indirect costs, it looks for the optimal time trajectory that minimizes the total cost. The study particularly focuses on the changing patterns of the optimal social isolation strategies under different combinations of cost priorities, compliance, and timeliness of intervention and their impact on epidemic control options. Through this method, the paper hopes to provide a more systematic and comprehensive understanding for future epidemic preparedness, especially in terms of how to weigh the direct health impacts of the epidemic against the indirect social impacts brought by control measures, thereby providing a scientific basis for formulating effective epidemic response strategies.