Abstract:As technology continues to advance, it is important to understand how website-based tools can support quality improvement. Website-based tools refer to resources such as toolkits that users can access and use autonomously through a dedicated website. This review examined how website-based tools can support healthcare professionals with quality improvement, including the optimal processes used to develop tools and the elements of an effective tool. A systematic search of seven databases was conducted to include articles published between January 2012 and January 2024. Articles were included if they were peer reviewed, written in English, based in health settings, and reported the development or evaluation of a quality improvement website-based tool for professionals. A narrative synthesis was conducted using NVivo. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. All papers were independently screened and coded by two authors using a six-phase conceptual framework by Braun and Clarke. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Themes identified were tool development processes, quality improvement mechanisms and barriers and facilitators to tool usage. Digitalizing existing quality improvement processes (n = 7), identifying gaps in practice (n = 6), and contributing to professional development (n = 3) were common quality improvement aims. Tools were associated with the reported enhancement of accuracy and efficiency in clinical tasks, improvement in adherence to guidelines, facilitation of reflective practice, and provision of tailored feedback for continuous quality improvement. Common features were educational resources (n = 7) and assisting the user to assess current practices against standards/recommendations (n = 6), which supported professionals in achieving better clinical outcomes, increased professional satisfaction and streamlined workflow in various settings. Studies reported facilitators to tool usage including relevance to practice, accessibility, and facilitating multidisciplinary action, making these tools practical and time-efficient for healthcare. However, barriers such as being time consuming, irrelevant to practice, difficult to use, and lack of organizational engagement were reported. Almost all tools were co-developed with stakeholders. The co-design approaches varied, reflecting different levels of stakeholder engagement and adoption of co-design methodologies. It is noted that the quality of included studies was low. These findings offer valuable insights for future development of quality improvement website-based tools in healthcare. Recommendations include ensuring tools are co-developed with healthcare professionals, focusing on practical usability and addressing common barriers to enhance engagement and effectiveness in improving healthcare quality. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to provide objective evidence of tool efficacy.

Quality improvement: Online resources to support nursing education and practice.

A Multisite Study of a Quality Improvement Teaching Strategy to Build Competency

An Integrative Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Nurse Engagement in Quality Improvement in the Clinical Practice Setting

An Active-Learning Quality Improvement Curriculum for Faculty in Hospital Medicine

Quality improvement into practice

Strategies for Strengthening Quality Improvement Projects in a Doctor of Nursing Practice Program

Quality improvement for NICU graduates: Feasible, relevant, impactful

Application of continuous quality improvement to medical education

Development and Testing of the Quality Improvement Self-efficacy Inventory

Using an online quiz-based reinforcement system to teach healthcare quality and patient safety and care transitions at the University of California

The utility of website-based quality improvement tools for health professionals: a systematic review

Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study

Re-thinking How We Teach Quality Improvement: Adding Meaning to an ACGME Requirement

An interprofessional postgraduate quality improvement curriculum: results and lessons learned over a 5-year implementation

Publication of quality improvement in medical oncology: A descriptive numerical summary from a scoping review.

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis: Determinants of the Effectiveness and Sustainability of Measurement-Focused Quality Improvement Trainings

Differentiation and Integration of Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Quality Improvement

A National Survey of Quality Improvement Education in Physician Assistant Programs

The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health Care

A Guide to Critical Appraisal of Quality Improvement Reports

"It Feels Like a Lot of Extra Work": Resident Attitudes About Quality Improvement and Implications for an Effective Learning Health Care System