Abstract:An age-old challenge in epistemology and moral philosophy is whether objectivity exists independent of subjective perspective. Alfred North Whitehead labeled it a "fallacy of misplaced concreteness"; after all, knowledge is represented elusively in symbols. I employ the free energy principle (FEP) to argue that the belief in moral objectivity, although perhaps fallacious, amounts to an ancient and universal human myth that is essential for our symbolic capacity. To perceive any object in a world of non-diminishing (perhaps irreducible) uncertainty, according to the FEP, its constituent parts must display common probabilistic tendencies, known as statistical beliefs, prior to its interpretation, or active inference, as a stable entity. Behavioral bias, subjective emotions, and social norms scale the scope of identity by coalescing agents with otherwise disparate goals and aligning their perspectives into a coherent structure. I argue that by declaring belief in norms as objective, e.g., expressing that a particular theft or infidelity was generally wrong, our ancestors psychologically constructed a type of identity bound only by shared faith in a perspective that technically transcended individual subjectivity. Signaling explicit belief in what were previously non-symbolic norms, as seen in many non-human animals, simulates a top-down point of view of our social interactions and thereby constructs our cultural niche and symbolic capacity. I demonstrate that, largely by contrasting with overly reductive analytical models that assume individual rational pursuit of extrinsic rewards, shared belief in moral conceptions, i.e., what amounts to a religious faith, remains a motivational cornerstone of our language, economic and civic institutions, stories, and psychology. Finally, I hypothesize that our bias for familiar accents (shibboleth), plausibly represents the phylogenetic and ontogenetic contextual origins of our impulse to minimize social surprise by declaring belief in the myth of objectivity.

Subjective and objective corruption of intuition and rational choice

Proxyeconomics, the inevitable corruption of proxy-based competition

Myth of objectivity and the origin of symbols

Perceived corruption reduces algorithm aversion

Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behavior

The curse of objectivity: Choosing objectively better products hinders consumers from receiving help

Exploring the path to corruption-An informed grounded theory study on the decision-making process underlying corruption

Tolerance for corruption and descriptive social norm: An experimental study of embezzlement

System circumvention: Dishonest‐illegal transgressions are perceived as justified in non‐meritocratic societies

Social Influence Undermines the Wisdom of the Crowd in Sequential Decision Making

Corruption in Organizations: Some General Formulations and (In-)Corruptibility Results

It's the biology, stupid! Proxy failures in economic decision making

The interactive effect between economic uncertainty and life history strategy on corrupt intentions: a life history theory approach

Beyond the Privacy Paradox: Objective versus Relative Risk in Privacy Decision Making

How Everyday Counterfeit Behavior That Disrupts Self Authenticity Might Lead to Corruption Tendencies

Obstacles to Ethical Decision-Making in the Perception of Ethical Context

The Manipulation: Socio-economic decision making

Corruption and Audit in Strategic Argumentation

Corrupt third parties undermine trust and prosocial behaviour between people

The Tragedy of Corruption. Corruption As a Social Dilemma

Dynamically Consistent Objective and Subjective Rationality