Abstract:GOCE is ESA’s gravity field mission and the first satellite ever that measures gravitational gradients in space, that is, the second spatial derivatives of the Earth’s gravitational potential. The goal is to determine the Earth’s mean gravitational field with unprecedented accuracy at spatial resolutions down to 100 km. GOCE carries a gravity gradiometer that allows deriving the gravitational gradients with very high precision to achieve this goal. There are two types of GOCE Level 2 gravitational gradients (GGs) along the orbit: the gravitational gradients in the gradiometer reference frame (GRF) and the gravitational gradients in the local north oriented frame (LNOF) derived from the GGs in the GRF by point-wise rotation. Because the VXX, VYY, VZZ and VXZ are much more accurate than VXY and VYZ, and because the error of the accurate GGs increases for low frequencies, the rotation requires that part of the measured GG signal is replaced by model signal. However, the actual quality of the gradients in GRF and LNOF needs to be assessed. We analysed the outliers in the GGs, validated the GGs in the GRF using independent gravity field information and compared their assessed error with the requirements. In addition, we compared the GGs in the LNOF with state-of-the-art global gravity field models and determined the model contribution to the rotated GGs. We found that the percentage of detected outliers is below 0.1% for all GGs, and external gravity data confirm that the GG scale factors do not differ from one down to the 10−3 level. Furthermore, we found that the error of VXX and VYY is approximately at the level of the requirement on the gravitational gradient trace, whereas the VZZ error is a factor of 2–3 above the requirement for higher frequencies. We show that the model contribution in the rotated GGs is 2–35% dependent on the gravitational gradient. Finally, we found that GOCE gravitational gradients and gradients derived from EIGEN-5C and EGM2008 are consistent over the oceans, but that over the continents the consistency may be less, especially in areas with poor terrestrial gravity data. All in all, our analyses show that the quality of the GOCE gravitational gradients is good and that with this type of data valuable new gravity field information is obtained.

Gravity Gradient Tensor Eigendecomposition for Spacecraft Positioning

On the Feasibility of Orbit Determination From Gravity Gradient Invariants

Stable solution of normalized total gravity gradient

Low-Earth Orbit Determination from Gravity Gradient Measurements

Autonomous orbit determination using epoch-differenced gravity gradients and starlight refraction

Full-tensor Gravity Gradient Eigenvector Analysis for Locating Complex Geological Source Positions

Rotation of GOCE gravity gradients to local frames

The celestial mechanics approach: theoretical foundations

Global marine gravity gradient tensor inverted from altimetry-derived deflections of the vertical: CUGB2023GRAD

GOCE gradients in various reference frames and their accuracies

Application of Gravity Gradients in the Process of GOCE Orbit Determination

The celestial mechanics approach: application to data of the GRACE mission

GOCE gravitational gradients along the orbit

Gravity Compensation Using Egm2008 for High-Precision Long-Term Inertial Navigation Systems

Geographic True Navigation Based on Real-Time Measurements of Geomagnetic Fields.

Searching for new physics in the solar system with tetrahedral spacecraft formations

Satellite gravity gradient grids for geophysics

Accurate Establishment of Error Models for the Satellite Gravity Gradiometry Recovery and Requirements Analysis for the Future GOCE Follow-On Mission

Autonomous orbit determination via kalman filtering of gravity gradients

Estimating Gradients of Physical Fields in Space

An Autonomous Planetary Navigation System Independent of GNSS and Ground Station Tracking