Abstract:The Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model is one of the most widely used models for ranking a collection of items or agents based on pairwise comparisons among them. Given $n$ agents, the BTL model endows each agent $i$ with a latent skill score $\alpha_i > 0$ and posits that the probability that agent $i$ is preferred over agent $j$ is $\alpha_i/(\alpha_i + \alpha_j)$. In this work, our objective is to formulate a hypothesis test that determines whether a given pairwise comparison dataset, with $k$ comparisons per pair of agents, originates from an underlying BTL model. We formalize this testing problem in the minimax sense and define the critical threshold of the problem. We then establish upper bounds on the critical threshold for general induced observation graphs (satisfying mild assumptions) and develop lower bounds for complete induced graphs. Our bounds demonstrate that for complete induced graphs, the critical threshold scales as $\Theta((nk)^{-1/2})$ in a minimax sense. In particular, our test statistic for the upper bounds is based on a new approximation we derive for the separation distance between general pairwise comparison models and the class of BTL models. To further assess the performance of our statistical test, we prove upper bounds on the type I and type II probabilities of error. Much of our analysis is conducted within the context of a fixed observation graph structure, where the graph possesses certain ``nice'' properties, such as expansion and bounded principal ratio. Additionally, we derive several auxiliary results, such as bounds on principal ratios of graphs, $\ell^2$-bounds on BTL parameter estimation under model mismatch, stability of rankings under the BTL model, etc. We validate our theoretical results through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets and propose a data-driven permutation testing approach to determine test thresholds.

Ranking Inferences Based on the Top Choice of Multiway Comparisons

SPECTRAL METHOD AND REGULARIZED MLE ARE BOTH OPTIMAL FOR TOP- K RANKING

Choosing to Rank

Statistical inference for pairwise comparison models

Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions

Combinatorial Inference on the Optimal Assortment in Multinomial Logit Models

Spectral MLE: Top-$K$ Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisons

Bounding Consideration Probabilities in Consider-Then-Choose Ranking Models

Statistical ranking with dynamic covariates

Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons

Rankmbpr: Rank-Aware Mutual Bayesian Personalized Ranking For Item Recommendationl

Minimax Hypothesis Testing for the Bradley-Terry-Luce Model

Clustered Mallows Model

Rate-Optimal Rank Aggregation with Private Pairwise Rankings

Uncertainty Quantification of MLE for Entity Ranking with Covariates

Learning Rich Rankings

Asymptotically Optimal Sequential Design for Rank Aggregation

Multiple Pairwise Ranking with Implicit Feedback.

Top-$K$ ranking with a monotone adversary

Prima: Probabilistic Ranking with Inter-Item Competition and Multi-Attribute Utility Function

Two-rank multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic distribution assessments: An optimization-based integrated approach