Epidural versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on pain relief and recovery after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: randomized clinical trial

Satoru Kikuchi,Takashi Matsusaki,Toshiharu Mitsuhashi,Shinji Kuroda,Hajime Kashima,Nobuo Takata,Ema Mitsui,Yoshihiko Kakiuchi,Kazuhiro Noma,Yuzo Umeda,Hiroshi Morimatsu,Toshiyoshi Fujiwara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad161

2024-01-03

BJS Open

Abstract:Abstract Background Epidural analgesia (EDA) is a main modality for postoperative pain relief in major open abdominal surgery within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. However, it remains unclear whether EDA is an imperative modality in laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). This study examined non-inferiority of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) to EDA in terms of postoperative pain and recovery in patients who underwent LG. Methods In this open-label, non-inferiority, parallel, individually randomized clinical trial, patients who underwent elective LG for gastric cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive either EDA or PCIA after surgery. The primary endpoint was pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale at rest 24 h after surgery, analysed both according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle and per protocol. The non-inferiority margin for pain score was set at 1. Secondary outcomes were postoperative parameters related to recovery and adverse events related to analgesia. Results Between 3 July 2017 and 29 September 2020, 132 patients were randomized to receive either EDA (n = 66) or PCIA (n = 66). After exclusions, 64 patients were included in the EDA group and 65 patients in the PCIA group for the ITT analysis. Pain score at rest 24 h after surgery was 1.94 (s.d. 2.07) in the EDA group and 2.63 (s.d. 1.76) in the PCIA group (P = 0.043). PCIA was not non-inferior to EDA for the primary endpoint (difference 0.69, one side 95% c.i. 1.25, P = 0.184) in ITT analysis. Postoperative parameters related to recovery were similar between groups. More EDA patients (21 (32.8%) versus 1 (1.5%), P < 0.001) developed postoperative hypotension as an adverse event. Conclusions PCIA was not non-inferior to EDA in terms of early-phase pain relief after LG. Registration number: UMIN000027643 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm).

surgery

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate whether patient - controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is non - inferior to epidural analgesia (EDA) in terms of early pain relief and recovery after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). Specifically, the main endpoint of the study is the pain score at rest 24 hours after surgery, which is evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The study also compares the differences between the two analgesic methods in terms of postoperative recovery parameters and analgesia - related adverse events.

### Research Background
- **Epidural Analgesia (EDA)**: In open abdominal surgery, EDA is the main analgesic method because it can provide better pain relief and reduce postoperative complications compared to opioid - based patient - controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).
- **Laparoscopic Surgery (LG)**: Laparoscopic surgery has smaller incisions, less postoperative pain, and a faster recovery time. Therefore, whether EDA is needed in laparoscopic surgery remains controversial.
- **Multimodal Analgesia (MMA)**: It is recommended for postoperative pain management because it can provide better pain relief while reducing the occurrence of adverse events.

### Research Objectives
- **Primary Objective**: To evaluate whether the pain score of PCIA at rest 24 hours after LG is not inferior to that of EDA.
- **Secondary Objective**: To compare the relative advantages of PCIA and EDA in terms of postoperative recovery parameters and analgesia - related adverse events.

### Research Design
- **Study Type**: A single - center prospective parallel - group non - inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT).
- **Sample Size**: 62 patients in each group, with a total sample size of 124 patients.
- **Random Allocation**: Randomly assigned to the EDA group or the PCIA group at a ratio of 1:1.
- **Primary Endpoint**: The NRS pain score at rest 24 hours after surgery.
- **Secondary Endpoints**: The day when the discharge criteria are met, the postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, pain scores on days 2, 3, and 4 after surgery, the dose of additional analgesics, analgesia - related adverse events, and patient satisfaction.

### Main Findings
- **Primary Result**: In the intention - to - treat (ITT) analysis, the pain score in the EDA group was 1.94 (standard deviation 2.07), while that in the PCIA group was 2.63 (standard deviation 1.76), with a difference of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 1.25) and a P - value of 0.184, failing to meet the non - inferiority criteria.
- **Secondary Results**: Postoperative recovery parameters (such as the day when the discharge criteria are met and the postoperative hospital stay) were similar between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative hypotension in the EDA group was significantly higher than that in the PCIA group (32.8% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001).

### Conclusions
- **PCIA is not inferior to EDA in terms of pain relief 24 hours after LG**, but fails to meet the non - inferiority criteria.
- **The two groups are similar in terms of postoperative recovery parameters**, but the incidence of postoperative hypotension in the EDA group is higher.
- **Although PCIA fails to prove its non - inferiority**, the overall pain scores in both groups are low and the difference is not large.

Based on these findings, the researchers believe that after LG, PCIA is not significantly inferior in overall recovery although it is not as good as EDA in terms of early pain relief. However, EDA may lead to more postoperative hypotension, which needs to be considered in clinical practice.