Effect of perioperative recipient management on initial renal allograft function

Christopher R. Shackleton,Martin T. Schechter,David N. Landsberg,Charles H. Scudamore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.1988.tb00492.x
1988-06-01
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:To study the effect of perioperative management on initial renal allograft function, we identified 22 consecutive cadaver donor kidney pairs in which one kidney was transplanted at one local institution (group I) while the contralateral kidney was transplanted at a second local hospital (group II). Donor‐derived and harvest parameters were uniform for each pair. The two institutions employed similar immunosuppressive protocols, but markedly different perioperative recipient management protocols including: a) maximal volume repletion, perioperative hemodynamic monitoring, and a parameter‐determined volume replacement protocol in group I; b) donor organ chilling during revascularization in group I; c) different intraoperative diuretics; d) different volume replacement solutions; and e) different immediate postoperative nursing settings. Rewarm times were significantly longer for group I grafts than for their group II contralateral counterparts (51 ± 10 min versus 29 ± 8 min; p < 0.001). Despite this, group I grafts produced significantly larger initial 24‐hour urine volumes than group II (6.4 ± 4.2 l versus 3.7 ± 2.9 l; p = 0.02). Mean change in serum creatinine in the initial 24 h was also significantly greater in group I than group II (–6.0 ± 2.6 mg/dl versus –2.6 ± 3.1 mg/dl; p = 0.003). None of the 22 grafts in group I manifested poor initial function while 9 of their 22 (45%) counterparts in group II did (p = 0.001). A total of 5 group II recipients required dialysis during the first 5 post‐transplant days while no group I patient was dialysed during this period (p = 0.05). We conclude that, given uniform donor organs, perioperative recipient management protocols appear to significantly influence initial urine volume, rate of fall of serum creatinine, and the incidence of ischemic injury in cadaveric renal allografts. In addition, the potentially deleterious effects of rewarm times greater than 45 min may be surmountable, in many cases, by perioperative interventions such as those utilized in group I recipients in the present study.
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?