An international perspective on training in child and adolescent psychiatry
Peter Deschamps,Brian Jacobs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01470-2
2020-01-01
Abstract:A picture emerges with a lot of similarities between child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) training across the world. First, taking the assumption that our trainees spend 40 h a week, 50 weeks a year and around 5 years on their total training programs, most of them will be in the vicinity of the 10,000 h rule by the end of their training when hours spent in general psychiatric training are included. That is reassuring, but should not be taken for granted in a time, where in most areas, guided by a shortage in the workforce and financial considerations, there is a tendency towards an increase in "efficiency" and shortening in total training time. Second, in most training programs, the three pillars and traditions of adjacent professions from which CAP emerged are clearly present. Adult psychiatry and psychotherapy are part of the curriculum almost everywhere, and so are pediatrics as well as a tradition in developmental psychology and cooperation with social care and educational systems. One initiative that we were surprised to read about was the Triple P training track in the US, not to be confused with the Triple P parenting program from Australia. In this program, a registration in CAP, general psychiatry, as well as pediatrics can be obtained at the end of training. A good question for the future is whether we need to strive towards a situation where every child and adolescent psychiatrist has as much background in each of these areas or allow for individual differences based on the trainee's preferences and talents. In a similar fashion, individual profiles with one or more in-depth training in scientific research, psychotherapy, or teaching skills may be considered. Third, as seems to be the case in more areas in society these days, we seem to be struggling with a balance between self-guidance and trust on one hand and quality control on the other hand. In our training programs, this becomes visible in valuable and necessary attempts to develop international European guidelines for a curriculum framework with a list of need-to-know and must-have-done for every child and adolescent psychiatrist as well as self-assessment and evaluation of knowledge and skills. These are to support country or other training bodies when setting their competence-based curricula. Besides training to achieve these clear set goals, we want to keep some space and time for our trainees for serendipity in training; some of our own valuable teaching and learning experiences were not planned ahead but emerged in a more natural way during the course of training. Fourth, we are trying to work to improve recruitment as well as retention. Again, this is something not unique to our profession. Both may be more closely related than expected at first glance. A life-long learning perspective including basic medical training, post-graduate CAP training, and continuous medical education suggests that we could start thinking about continuity of training even more than we do today. Of note, training other medical colleagues in CAP may not only help us to recruit future talents for CAP, but may also help us to lay a basis for future cooperation, consultation, and broaden the workforce to enhance child and adolescent mental health services. It is likely to help patients.
pediatrics,psychiatry,psychology, developmental