Using Field Measurements and Numerical Simulations to Constrain Mechanisms of Ice Formation During the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment Intensive Operational Period

Abstract:Mechanisms of ice formation in supercooled clouds that are too warm to allow the homogeneous nucleation of water remain poorly constrained by measurements (e.g., Cotton and Field 2002). Ice mass and number concentrations have long been thought to exceed what can be quantitatively explained by simultaneous measurements of ice nuclei (e.g., Koenig 1963; Beard 1992). In late 2004 at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program’s North Slope of Alaska site, the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) Intensive Operation Period revisited this problem with state-of-the-art instrumentation on aircraft, ground, and satellite platforms. Here we use ground and aircraft data to constrain numerical simulations of the October 9–10 single-layer mixed-phase boundary layer cloud case. The simulations are carried out with a large-eddy simulation code (Stevens and Bretherton 1996; Kirkpatrick et al. 2006) with size-resolved microphysics (aerosols, liquid, and ice) (Jensen et al. 1998; Ackerman et al. 1995) and two-stream radiative transfer at 44 wavelength bands (Toon et al. 1989). We focus specifically on understanding the phase, mass, and number size distribution measurements that were quality-controlled by the McFarquhar research group in order to evaluate various hypotheses for ice enhancement under the M-PACE conditions. We note that it is especially difficult to evaluate ice number owing to the difficulty of identifying the phase of small particles and eliminating instrumental uncertainties associated with aircraft measurements. Cloud particle images indicating small ice crystals that resemble laboratory specimens (e.g., Bacon et al. 2003), for instance, may be artifacts of large particle shattering on inlets. Mass measurements are also subject to difficult uncertainties associated with particle size distribution (e.g., Korolev et al. 2004). Our goal here is to take all available measurements provided to us this time and quantitatively evaluate consistent microphysical explanations for them.
Environmental Science,Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?