Clinical utility of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing among immunocompromised patients with pneumonia
Deng B Madut,Roy F Chemaly,Sanjeet S Dadwal,Joshua A Hill,Yeon Joo Lee,Ghady Haidar,Alfred Luk,Alexander Drelick,Peter V Chin-Hong,Esther Benamu,Fareed Khawaja,Deepa Nanayakkara,Genovefa A Papanicolaou,Catherine Butkus Small,Monica Fung,Michelle Barron,Thomas Davis,Micah T McClain,Eileen K Maziarz,Armando D Bedoya,Daniel L Gilstrap,Jamie L Todd,Christina E Barkauskas,Madeleine R Heldman,Robert Bigelow,Jeffrey D Leimberger,Ephraim L Tsalik,Olivia Wolf,Mona Mughar,Constance Lau,Nicholas Noll,Desiree Hollemon,Radha Duttagupta,Daniel S Lupu,Sivan Bercovici,Bradley A Perkins,Timothy A Blauwkamp,Vance G Fowler,Thomas L Holland,Stephen P Bergin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae425
2024-07-22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing can establish the etiology of multiple infectious syndromes by identifying microbial DNA in plasma. However, data are needed to define the clinical scenarios where this tool offers the highest clinical benefit. Methods We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study that evaluated the impact of plasma mcfDNA sequencing compared to usual care testing among adults with hematologic malignancies. This is a secondary analysis of an expanded cohort that evaluated the clinical utility of plasma mcfDNA sequencing across prespecified and adjudicated outcomes. We examined the percentage of participants for whom plasma mcfDNA sequencing identified a probable cause of pneumonia or clinically relevant non-pneumonia infection. We then assessed potential changes in antimicrobial therapy based on plasma mcfDNA sequencing results, and the potential for early mcfDNA testing to avoid bronchoscopy and its associated adverse events. Results Of 223 participants, at least one microbial detection by plasma mcfDNA sequencing was adjudicated as a probable cause of pneumonia in 57 (25.6%) and a clinically relevant non-pneumonia infection in 88 (39.5%). A probable cause of pneumonia was exclusively identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing in 23 (10.3%) participants. Antimicrobial therapy would have changed for 41 (18.4%) participants had plasma mcfDNA results been available in real-time. Among the 57 participants with a probable cause of pneumonia identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing, bronchoscopy identified no additional probable cause of pneumonia in 52 (91.2%). Conclusions Plasma mcfDNA sequencing could improve management of both pneumonia and other concurrent infections in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology