Abstract:The development of new technological methods surely improves the quality of the Diagnostic Services in Parasitology offered to the National Sanitary Service, however, cost and simplicity have not to be neglected, even when the prime consideration is efficiency. Moreover, the mere fact that something can be done by one of these new approaches does not mean that it should be done that way or that it is most cost-effective to do it that way. A review of diagnostic tools in Parasitology is proposed, to evaluate when and why each of them should be applied. Traditional procedures for the diagnosis of parasitosis are only based on the "direct" recovery and recognition of the parasite, with the microscope as main tool and few other instruments as co-operator. The innovative procedures, recently adjusted on the basis of new scientific knowledge and made possible by the development of the laboratory instrument weapons, can evidence the parasites both directly and indirectly. If it is obvious that the direct identification of a pathogen is more reliable than that indirect, is not so evident what is the most useful direct method, and when it would be better to use indirect diagnostic tools. Advantages and disadvantages of each procedure, cost as well as the purpose of the test (diagnosis, post-treatment, research), and the general condition in which the test have to been applied must be taken into account when we are choosing. In general, we can say that the rationale for their use can be summarised as follows: 1) The macroscopic/microscopic analysis of samples is always recommended (with the exception of samples coming from tissues that need surgery). This "old" procedure allows the identification in 20 minutes of all the parasites present in mixed infections, and the evaluation of the parasite load. It is a cost-effective method which relies ultimately on the skill of the observer to detect and identify parasite stages; 2) Parasite antigen detection is an innovative and expensive immunological diagnostic, which can suffer of sensitivity and specificity. It could be useful to directly diagnose "occult" infections; 3) Parasite DNA/RNA direct detection is an innovative, sensitive and specific procedure, which can also identify sibling species. It is expensive, therefore its use is restricted to reference laboratories; 4) Host antibody detection is an innovative indirect tool to evaluate the presence of a parasite by means the evaluation of the host response to infection. It can suffer of sensitivity and specificity, and the interpretation of the test results may be difficult. It could be applied as first step to evaluate the presence of tissue parasites, whose direct diagnosis would require surgery. Some tests can be performed in well-equipped laboratories; other tests are available through research laboratories. The specimens, appropriately collected and preserved, have always to be processed in security for potential risk of infection hazard, and submitted to tests appropriate to the laboratory's goals, where, therefore, field and research diagnostic tools shouldn't be applied. The test selected for routine use has to be chosen taking into account value and limitations of each method. Reduction in excessive and often unnecessary testing is mandatory, and therefore it is critical for the clinical Parasitology to perform relevant testing while maintaining appropriate quality. To date, the microscopic analysis of samples is the only direct method that allows all identifications in short times, at a reduced cost, independently from geographical origin and peculiar status of the patient. It has to be regarded as the first step in diagnostic procedures for all laboratories. Some molecular techniques have greater sensitivity than traditional methods, but at least at the present time, their costs may well preclude their routine use. It is difficult to know, exactly, where diagnostic Parasitology will be moving in the next few years, although many soothsayers feel very strongly that the area of molecular diagnostics will replace more traditional means. It is also possible that immunological or perhaps cytometric procedures will replace our more standard diagnostic approach; nevertheless they will continue to remain oddities on the outside of the general practice and be confined to a few reference laboratories. As far as semi-automated or automated instruments and robotics-based techniques, they are useful when large numbers of the same test are performed. Supposing that they will enter in our laboratory, that will happen in central facility rather than in each local facility. So, the great interest in using new technological methods to solve old problems probably will have to be seen in the right perspective.

Staining blindly: an update on coloring techniques for fecal smears in parasitology: a scoping review

Laboratory validation of the automated diagnosis of intestinal parasites via fecal sample processing for the recovery of intestinal parasites through the dissolved air flotation technique

Comparison of the Benzanthrone Luminophores: They Are Not Equal for Rapid Examination of Parafasciolopsis fasciolaemorpha (Trematoda: Digenea)

Evaluation of Streck tissue fixative, a nonformalin fixative for preservation of stool samples and subsequent parasitologic examination

Modified trichrome stain for faster and improved detection of intestinal protozoan parasites

Detection of intestinal parasites in human faecal samples using dissolved air flotation

Evaluation of an improved Giemsa staining technique for blood borne parasite in thick and thin blood film from dogs

Diagnóstico molecular de parasitosis intestinales

Quantitative and comparative assessment of dyes and protocols for rapid ex vivo microscopy of fresh tissues

Automated Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasites: A new hybrid approach and its benefits

[Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied]

Automated parasitological diagnosis in clinical microbiology laboratories

Comparison of the egg recovery rates and limit of detection for soil-transmitted helminths using the Kato-Katz thick smear, faecal flotation and quantitative real-time PCR in human stool

Microbial artists: the role of parasite microbiomes in explaining colour polymorphism among amphipods and potential link to host manipulation

Progress in the Development of Microscopical Techniques for Diagnostic Pathology

Safe Food Coloring Agent as an Alternative to Eosin Stain

Died or Not Dyed: Assessment of Viability and Vitality Dyes on Planktonic Cells and Biofilms from Candida parapsilosis

Multicenter comparative study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA extraction methods from stool samples, and mechanical pretreatment protocols evaluation

Synthetic Food Coloring as an Alternative to Worm Egg Staining Ascaris lumbricoides

Evaluating Diagnostic Clarity: The Comparative Efficacy of BlueStain in Serous Effusion Cytology under the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology Reporting Framework

Improvement of POC-CCA Interpretation by Using Lyophilization of Urine from Patients with Schistosoma mansoni Low Worm Burden: Towards an Elimination of Doubts about the Concept of Trace