Decomposing geographical judgments into spatial, temporal and linguistic components

Daniele Gatti,Giorgia Anceresi,Marco Marelli,Tomaso Vecchi,Luca Rinaldi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01980-7

2024-06-07

Psychological Research

Abstract:When mentally exploring maps representing large-scale environments (e.g., countries or continents), humans are assumed to mainly rely on spatial information derived from direct perceptual experience (e.g., prior visual experience with the geographical map itself). In the present study, we rather tested whether also temporal and linguistic information could account for the way humans explore and ultimately represent this type of maps. We quantified temporal distance as the minimum time needed to travel by train across Italian cities, while linguistic distance was retrieved from natural language through cognitively plausible AI models based on non-spatial associative learning mechanisms (i.e., distributional semantic models). In a first experiment, we show that temporal and linguistic distances capture with high-confidence real geographical distances. Next, in a second behavioral experiment, we show that linguistic information can account for human performance over and above real spatial information (which plays the major role in explaining participants' performance) in a task in which participants have to judge the distance between cities (while temporal information was found to be not relevant). These findings indicate that, when exploring maps representing large-scale environments, humans do take advantage of both perceptual and linguistic information, suggesting in turn that the formation of cognitive maps possibly relies on a strict interplay between spatial and non-spatial learning principles.

psychology, experimental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore how spatial, linguistic, and temporal information collectively shape human mental representations (i.e., cognitive maps) of large-scale environments such as countries or continents. The researchers tested how these different dimensions of information interact through two experiments.

In Experiment 1, the researchers quantified the spatial distance, linguistic distance, and temporal distance from major Italian cities to Milan (Experiment 1A) and Rome (Experiment 1B). Spatial distance was calculated based on geographic coordinates; linguistic distance was obtained through Distributional Semantic Models (DSMs), which are based on non-spatial associative learning mechanisms; temporal distance was estimated based on the shortest travel time by train. The results showed a significant correlation between spatial distance and temporal distance, and moderate correlations between spatial distance and linguistic distance, as well as between temporal distance and linguistic distance. This suggests that linguistic and temporal information can serve as effective proxies for estimating spatial relationships in large-scale environments.

In Experiment 2, the researchers further investigated through behavioral experiments whether linguistic and temporal information could explain human performance in judging distances between cities beyond spatial information. Participants were asked to judge which of the given city pairs was closer to Milan. The results indicated that spatial information indeed influenced participants' accuracy and reaction time. Interestingly, linguistic information also had a significant impact on participants' accuracy and reaction time, whereas temporal information did not show a significant correlation.

In summary, this paper reveals that when people process maps of large-scale environments, they rely not only on spatial information obtained through direct perceptual experience but also on linguistic information. This suggests that the formation of cognitive maps may depend on a close interaction between spatial and non-spatial learning principles.