Use of a footstool improves rectal balloon expulsion in some patients with defecatory disorders

Lauren Ulsh,Houssam Halawi,George Triadafilopoulos,Brooke Gurland,Linda Nguyen,Patricia Garcia,Irene Sonu,Nielsen Fernandez‐Becker,Laren Becker,Vipul Sheth,Leila Neshatian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14781
2024-03-16
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Abstract:This is a retrospective review of patients with defecatory disorders (DDs) from a tertiary referral center that identifies clinical characteristics and anorectal pressure phenotypes of patients with DDs that achieve successful rectal balloon expulsion only with a footstool. Background Whether patients with defecatory disorders (DDs) with favorable response to a footstool have distinctive anorectal pressure characteristics is unknown. We aimed to identify the clinical phenotype and anorectal pressure profile of patients with DDs who benefit from a footstool. Methods This is a retrospective review of patients with high resolution anorectal manometry (HR‐ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) from a tertiary referral center. BET was repeated with a 7‐inch‐high footstool in those who failed it after 120 s. Data were compared among groups with respect to BET results. Key Results Of the 667 patients with DDs, a total of 251 (38%) had failed BET. A footstool corrected BET in 41 (16%) of those with failed BET. Gender‐specific differences were noted in anorectal pressures, among patients with and without normal BET, revealing gender‐based nuances in pathophysiology of DDs. Comparing patients who passed BET with footstool with those who did not, the presence of optimal stool consistency, with reduced instances of loose stools and decreased reliance on laxatives were significant. Additionally, in women who benefited from a footstool, lower anal pressures at rest and simulated defecation were observed. Independent factors associated with a successful BET with a footstool in women included age <50, Bristol 3 or 4 stool consistency, lower anal resting pressure and higher rectoanal pressure gradient. Conclusion & Inferences Identification of distinctive clinical and anorectal phenotype of patients who benefited from a footstool could provide insight into the factors influencing the efficacy of footstool utilization and allow for an individualized treatment approach in patients with DDs.
gastroenterology & hepatology,neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?